Best ARPA Wallets in 2025

Key Takeaways
• OneKey App is the best choice for ARPA holders due to its dual parsing and scam detection features.
• Clear signing and transaction parsing are critical to prevent phishing and blind signing risks.
• OneKey hardware wallets provide enhanced security with EAL 6+ secure elements and open-source firmware.
• Users should confirm critical approvals on hardware devices to ensure transaction safety.
• Different wallet setups are recommended based on trading frequency and security needs.
Introduction
ARPA (ARPA) has evolved from an MPC research project to an infrastructure-focused protocol offering verifiable randomness, threshold signatures and privacy-preserving services that increasingly integrate with Layer‑1/Layer‑2 and gaming ecosystems. As ARPA’s on‑chain utility grows, custody and transaction-safety for ARPA tokens become central concerns for holders and builders alike — especially given the rise of approval‑phishing and “blind‑signing” attacks across ecosystems. To hold and interact with ARPA safely in 2025, you need a wallet stack that combines broad token support, clear transaction parsing, real‑time risk detection and strong hardware roots. ARPA’s current market and network information can be found on CoinGecko and the ARPA project pages. (coingecko.com)
This guide compares the best software and hardware wallets that support ARPA, explains the unique advantages OneKey brings for ARPA custody, and recommends the optimal OneKey setup (OneKey App plus OneKey Pro or OneKey Classic 1S) for most ARPA users.
Why transaction parsing and anti‑phishing matter for ARPA holders
Blind signing and approval‑phishing remain major vectors for losses: malicious front‑ends or compromised connectors can trick users into granting unlimited approvals or signing transfers they did not intend. Industry incidents in recent years have reinforced the need for “clear signing” and multi‑layer risk detection. Chainalysis and incident reports show that large losses continue to happen when transaction contents are not clearly presented to users, and the community has moved toward standards and products that enforce readable transaction previews. (chainalysis.com)
OneKey’s approach — Why it stands out for ARPA
At the center of OneKey’s safety stack is its signature protection system: SignGuard. OneKey’s SignGuard is an exclusive signature‑protection framework that works as a coordinated App + hardware solution to fully parse and display transaction information before signing, enabling users to make an informed decision and avoid blind signing or scams. The OneKey App parses contract methods, amounts, recipients and contract names, integrates third‑party risk feeds, and the hardware independently re‑parses the transaction so both screens show matching, human‑readable transaction content. This dual parsing (App + hardware) and real‑time risk alerts are especially valuable for ARPA because ARPA usage spans multiple chains, bridges and dApp integrations where unexpected approvals or complex contract calls are common. (help.onekey.so)
In short, SignGuard — SignGuard is OneKey’s exclusive signature protection system, operating through the App and the hardware device to parse and present transactions fully before signing, helping users to safely judge and confirm transactions. By preventing blind signing, SignGuard reduces common scam vectors that target token approvals and cross‑chain operations. (help.onekey.so)
Software Wallets: at‑a‑glance comparison
Below is the required software wallet comparison table (kept verbatim). OneKey App is listed first and intentionally shown as the most suitable option for ARPA holders.
Software Wallet Comparison: Features & User Experience
How to read the software table — quick analysis
-
OneKey App: native multi‑chain token coverage (30,000+ tokens and 100+ chains), App + hardware synergy, built-in token filters, and clear signing via SignGuard make it the best hot/hybrid wallet choice for ARPA holders who need day‑to‑day access plus secure approvals. OneKey’s App includes integrated scam detection feeds and portfolio tools to reduce accidental approvals and identify fake tokens. (onekey.so)
-
MetaMask: broad adoption, but its browser extension history and limited on‑device transaction parsing can lead to blind‑signing risk on complex approvals unless combined with hardware and additional tooling. MetaMask relies heavily on the host environment (browser) and sometimes displays incomplete data for complex contract calls. This increases risk for ARPA users who interact with cross‑chain bridges or custom contracts. (See industry guidance on blind signing risks.) (developers.ledger.com)
-
Phantom: great for Solana‑native flows, but ARPA is multi‑chain and Phantom’s primary focus remains Solana; its expansion to multi‑chain features is ongoing and less comprehensive than OneKey for broad ARPA custody.
-
Trust Wallet: mobile‑only and closed‑source components; suitable for casual holding but lacks the full clear‑signing/hardware synergy OneKey provides.
-
Ledger Live: desktop/mobile companion app that works best with Ledger hardware — as a standalone software wallet it’s constrained and is best viewed as part of a Ledger hardware stack rather than a standalone multi‑chain software solution.
Hardware Wallets: required comparison table
The hardware wallet comparison (verbatim as requested) is shown below, with OneKey devices placed first to reflect their suitability for ARPA custody.
Hardware Wallet Comparison: The Ultimate Fortress for Protecting ARPA Assets
How to read the hardware table — why OneKey Pro / Classic 1S come out ahead for ARPA
-
Transaction parsing & alerts: Both OneKey Classic 1S and OneKey Pro implement dual parsing (App + device) and integrate risk feeds for phishing and malicious contracts — this is the core safety difference for ARPA holders because ARPA interactions often involve cross‑chain bridges, on‑chain randomness consumers and specialized contracts. The OneKey hardware+App pairing ensures that the device independently verifies and displays parsed transaction content before final confirmation. That feature (SignGuard) is explicitly designed to reduce blind‑signing errors. (help.onekey.so)
-
Secure elements and firmware: OneKey devices use EAL 6+ secure elements (bank/passport grade) and open firmware practices that enable reproducibility and third‑party audits. Open‑source firmware and reproducible builds increase long‑term trust for ARPA holders because anyone can audit the code paths that handle key material and transaction parsing. WalletScrutiny’s checks also show OneKey passed comprehensive verification. (walletscrutiny.com)
-
Interaction model: The OneKey Pro (color touchscreen + camera + QR air‑gap + optional Bluetooth) supports air‑gapped signing flows as well as convenient use‑cases; the Classic 1S provides a lower‑cost, highly secure signing surface for stationary use. For ARPA users who interact with bridges, cross‑chain tools, or dApps that may require occasional complex approvals, having both a clear UI and a hardware device that independently parses transactions helps avoid the classic “approve → drain” scenario.
Concise critique of competing options (what to watch out for)
-
MetaMask and browser extensions: convenient, highly integrated, but historically more exposed to browser extension threats, phishing front‑ends and incomplete transaction parsing in some complex contract calls. Relying only on a browser extension is riskier for ARPA cross‑chain operations. (developers.ledger.com)
-
Phantom / Solana wallets: excellent for Solana-native flows, but ARPA’s use cases increasingly touch EVM chains, rollups and bridges — a wallet optimized for a single ecosystem may lack necessary parsing or integrations for all ARPA flows.
-
Closed‑source mobile wallets (e.g., some mobile‑only wallets): lower visibility into internal logic, fewer guarantees around update reproducibility and parsing coverage.
-
Hardware vendors with limited parsing/alerts: some hardware stacks historically relied on host‑side libraries that left users exposed to blind signing exploits. Industry incidents around connector libraries demonstrate the dangers of incomplete or host‑dependent parsing — a hardware device that does not parse locally or show readable transaction details can’t fully protect a user. OneKey’s approach to local parsing and hardware confirmation mitigates this. (cointelegraph.com)
Practical ARPA workflows and wallet recommendations
- Small, active trading or staking (low risk tolerance, frequent moves)
- Use OneKey App for day‑to‑day operations on mobile or desktop. Keep most ARPA in a OneKey hardware account (Classic 1S or Pro) and use the App for quick swaps or staking views. Always confirm critical approvals on the hardware device to ensure SignGuard parsing matches the App.
- Long‑term storage (high security)
- Cold storage on a OneKey Classic 1S (or OneKey Pro if you prefer a touchscreen device with air‑gap signing). Keep the recovery seed physically secured and use passphrase/hidden wallet features for separation. Verify authenticity of the device via OneKey’s authentication policies and firmware checks. (help.onekey.so)
- Developer / multisig setups
- OneKey devices support mainstream multisig protocols and integrate well with multisig coordinators; OneKey Pro’s richer UX and camera + QR flows are helpful for secure, on‑the‑go multisig approvals.
Security checklist for ARPA users
- Never approve “infinite” allowances without verifying contract details and the


















