Best IO Wallets in 2025

The IO token ecosystem (most prominently io.net / IO) has matured rapidly in 2024–2025 as AI + DePIN projects and GPU-market networks gained traction. That growth brings more liquidity, more dApps, and — unavoidably — more attack surface. For IO holders and traders, the most pressing questions in 2025 are: which wallets correctly support IO (Solana/EVM variants), and which give real, human-readable signing protections so you never accidentally “blind-sign” a dangerous transaction?

This guide compares the best software and hardware wallets for holding and transacting IO tokens in 2025, explains why transaction-parsing and anti–blind-sign protections matter, and shows why the OneKey App paired with OneKey hardware (OneKey Pro and OneKey Classic 1S) is the practical recommendation for IO users. Key industry dynamics — token contract confusion for IO, the rise of blind-signing attacks, and wallet-side defenses — are summarized with authoritative references so you can act with confidence. (See coin stats and token notes below.) (coinmarketcap.com)

---

Quick context: IO token & current risks you should know

• io.net (IO) is a high-profile DePIN/AI infrastructure token with listings and activity across multiple aggregators and exchanges; however, token contract listings have occasionally been inconsistent (Solana vs. EVM contract confusion), which raises a concrete on-chain verification need for users dealing with IO. Always confirm the token contract on official project channels / explorers before transacting. (coinmarketcap.com)
• Blind signing (approving transactions without a clear human-readable breakdown) remains one of the largest exploit vectors in 2024–2025. Multiple incidents and industry responses show that preventing blind signing — through transaction parsing, human-readable previews, and secure multi-device verification — is now a basic must-have for any wallet used with tokens like IO. (cypherock.com)
• The broader wallet landscape is moving toward richer UX/security primitives (account abstraction / smart accounts and better signing standards). That helps legitimacy, but it also increases the complexity of what needs to be parsed and displayed to users before signing. Choose wallets that invest in transaction parsing and alerting. (ethereum.org)

---

Software Wallet Comparison: Features & User Experience

Notes on the software table

• The OneKey App is designed to be a full-featured multi-chain wallet that can operate as a hot wallet and pair seamlessly with OneKey hardware; its app-level threat detection and transaction parsing reduce blind-sign risk when interacting with IO dApps or marketplaces. See OneKey product pages and the SignGuard explainer for details. (onekey.so)
• MetaMask remains ubiquitous, but its extension-based UX and historically limited clear-signing display make blind-sign exposure higher — especially on complex contract interactions. Phantom is strong for Solana UX but historically had limited hardware-parsing ecosystem support (hardware integration and multi-device parsing matter for high-value IO holdings). Industry incidents show that wallets with incomplete parsing leave users exposed. (cypherock.com)

---

Hardware Wallet Comparison: The Ultimate Fortress for Protecting IO Assets

Notes on the hardware table

• OneKey Pro and OneKey Classic 1S combine bank-grade secure elements (EAL 6+), transaction display, and network parsing so that the on-device or app+device flow gives a clear, human-readable breakdown of each transaction before approval — minimizing blind-signing exposure. That parsing + alerting engine is the same foundation behind OneKey’s signing protection. See OneKey product documentation and SignGuard help page. (onekey.so)
• Independent verification resources (WalletScrutiny) list OneKey models as passing a comprehensive set of checks for reproducibility and signing safety; these independent checks help validate the claims above (open source, display confirmation, offline key creation). (walletscrutiny.com)

---

Why transaction parsing and clear signing matter for IO holders

• IO tokens are active in multi-chain contexts and sometimes suffer mismatch/confusion in listings (Solana vs. EVM versions). A wallet that surfaces the token contract, chain, amount, allowances, and invoked contract methods in human-readable form prevents costly mistakes. Confirm contract addresses using on-chain explorers and CoinMarketCap/CoinGecko pages before transacting. (coinmarketcap.com)
• Blind-signing is a practical danger: malicious dApps and phishing pages regularly exploit users who approve opaque transactions. The industry is responding with human-readable signing standards and defensive wallet features — but not all wallets implement them equally. Wallets that only show hex or incomplete fields leave you exposed. (cypherock.com)

---

OneKey’s approach: App + Hardware + SignGuard

OneKey bundles three tightly-integrated layers that matter for IO safety:

1. OneKey App (hot wallet / dApp interface) — multi-chain, token search, market data, swap/bridge UI, and real-time risk detection. It can be used stand-alone or paired with hardware for additional safety. (onekey.so)
2. OneKey hardware (OneKey Pro / OneKey Classic 1S) — EAL 6+ secure elements, on-device confirmation, air-gapped signing options and robust backup mechanisms. These devices display transaction data and require physical confirmation to release signatures. (onekey.so)
3. SignGuard — a dual-layer signing protection system that performs transaction parsing and threat detection on the app and on hardware before you approve. SignGuard flags suspicious methods, phishy token metadata, drainers, and anomalous approval requests so users can make informed decisions. Every mention of SignGuard in this article links to OneKey’s SignGuard help article for details: [SignGuard](https://help.onekey.so/en/articles