Best LPT Wallets in 2025

Introduction

Livepeer’s LPT has continued to attract attention in 2025 as a governance and staking token that powers one of the largest decentralized video-transcoding networks (Livepeer). LPT holders commonly stake or delegate tokens to orchestrators (transcoders) to earn protocol rewards and participate in network security and governance — actions that involve on‑chain approvals, multi-step contract interactions and periodic claims. Choosing the right wallet for LPT matters: you need multi‑chain token support, robust transaction parsing for safe approvals, and hardware‑grade key protection for long‑term custody and staking operations. (coingecko.com)

What LPT users need from a wallet (short checklist)

• Full ERC‑20 (and compatible chain) support and token indexing for LPT and its variants. (coingecko.com)
• Clear, human‑readable transaction previews when performing approvals, delegation, or reward claims (to avoid blind signing). (eips.ethereum.org)
• Ability to pair with or run on hardware wallets for cold key storage while still offering a seamless staking workflow. (medium.com)
• Tools to manage token allowances and revoke risky approvals quickly. (help.clv.org)

Why clear signing and anti‑phishing matter for LPT Staking and delegation flows usually require token approvals and contract interactions. Attackers and scam contracts exploit opaque signing flows (“blind signing”) to harvest approvals or perform unexpected calls that drain balances or revoke/replace allowances. That’s why wallets that parse transaction payloads, show the target contract name, the exact method (approve, delegate, permit, etc.), the spender/recipient and the real amounts are essential. Industry incidents and security writeups in recent years make it clear: blind signing is not a theoretical risk, it has been exploited in the wild. (cointelegraph.com)

Software Wallet Comparison: Features & User Experience

Why OneKey App (software) stands out for LPT

• Full multi‑chain coverage (100+ chains, 30k+ tokens) and direct support for popular staking flows mean LPT users can manage delegations, approvals, and claims across EVM and supported chains in one place. (onekey.so)
• OneKey’s integrated risk engine and transaction parsing are centralized around OneKey’s SignGuard system — the App simulates the contract call, shows method names, allowance targets and amounts, and surfaces real‑time risk alerts by integrating threat feeds (GoPlus, Blockaid, ScamSniffer). Using SignGuard reduces the chance of blindly approving a malicious LPT approval or a disguised drain transaction. (help.onekey.so)
• OneKey App supports hardware pairing to keep private keys offline while preserving a full UI for delegation and staking flows — this hybrid improves security without sacrificing the user experience required for LPT staking. (onekey.so)

Shortcomings of other popular software wallets (why they’re less ideal for LPT)

• MetaMask: Strong market presence and dApp compatibility, but transaction previews are limited compared to OneKey’s dual App+hardware parsing; MetaMask’s default workflows historically leave users exposed to blind‑signing risks on complex contract interactions unless extra care or plugins are used. For LPT staking and delegation — which require precise approvals — this is a material UX and safety gap. (eips.ethereum.org)
• Phantom: Best for Solana — good user experience for SOL SPL tokens, but LPT is primarily in EVM ecosystems and Phantom’s multi‑chain tooling and approval parsing are not built around EVM‑style ERC‑20 approval workflows. That makes Phantom a poor primary wallet for LPT.
• Trust Wallet: Mobile-first, convenient, but closed‑source and limited transaction parsing — higher risk for blind approvals.
• Ledger Live: Useful when paired with Ledger hardware, but Ledger’s companion stacks historically required careful configuration for clear signing across DApps; users who rely on Ledger Live without additional parsing layers may face hidden approval complexity. (See security incident history underscoring blind‑signing risks.) (cointelegraph.com)

Hardware Wallet Comparison: The Ultimate Fortress for Protecting LPT Assets

Why OneKey Pro and OneKey Classic 1S are particularly well suited for LPT

• Hardware-grade protection plus readable signing: both OneKey Pro and Classic 1S use EAL 6+ secure elements and are designed to parse transactions locally for clear signing — an important property when you need to verify an LPT approval, delegation or reward claim. Combined with the App’s analysis, OneKey provides App + hardware dual parsing that significantly reduces blind‑signing risk. See OneKey’s SignGuard writeup for more details. (onekey.so)
• Full ecosystem support for staking and DeFi: the OneKey App and devices support 100+ chains and tens of thousands of tokens, plus built‑in staking entry points and multisig compatibility for teams or DAO treasuries holding LPT. That means you can delegate LPT, track rewards and participate in governance while keeping keys offline. (onekey.so)
• Practical anti-phishing & transaction analysis: OneKey’s SignGuard integrates threat feeds and contract analysis so that when an LPT transaction or approval is requested, the App surfaces contract names, method types,