Best LQTY Wallets in 2025
Key Takeaways
• LQTY requires secure storage solutions to mitigate risks such as phishing and blind-signing attacks.
• OneKey's software and hardware combination offers the best protection and usability for LQTY holders.
• Key features to look for in a wallet include readable transaction parsing, real-time risk detection, and robust Ethereum support.
LQTY (Liquity’s secondary token) remains an important asset for DeFi users who stake to capture protocol fees and participate in Liquity’s incentive mechanisms. In 2025 the core custody question hasn’t changed: how do you store LQTY so that you can stake, approve, and interact with dApps safely without exposing yourself to the widespread risk of phishing and blind-signing attacks? This guide compares the top software and hardware wallets that support LQTY, explains current industry risks, and shows why OneKey’s software + hardware combo (OneKey App + OneKey Pro / OneKey Classic 1S) is the most suitable choice for LQTY holders in 2025.
Key references
- Official LQTY info and staking docs: Liquity documentation.
- LQTY token overview & market data: CoinMarketCap and Etherscan.
- OneKey SignGuard & Clear Signing: OneKey Help Center.
- Blind-signing and transaction-parsing risks coverage: Cointelegraph / The Block.
(Links appear inline below where relevant.)
Why LQTY custody matters (short)
- LQTY is an ERC-20 with a max supply of 100M and is used for staking to earn protocol fees. Proper custody is required if you plan to stake or interact with Liquity frontends. Liquity Docs — LQTY Staking & Distribution and the official staking guides explain how staking works.
- Staking and approvals require on-chain signatures; poorly parsed transactions and blind-signing are among the main attack vectors that lead to irreversible loss. See coverage on blind signing and industry responses. (e.g., Cointelegraph on blind signing risks and The Block on ecosystem changes to transaction signing.)
What to look for in a wallet for LQTY in 2025
- Full readable transaction parsing (so you can "see what you sign").
- Real-time contract risk detection and token verification.
- Native support for Ethereum and EVM chains (LQTY staking is Ethereum-based, so robust Ethereum/EVM support is mandatory).
- Hardware-backed signing (for long-term storage and staking) with a trustworthy display to verify final details.
- Recovery & backup models that align with your threat model (seed phrase best practices, optional passphrase/hidden-wallet capabilities).
- Usability for staking workflows (ability to stake LQTY via Liquity frontends or staking contracts).
Software Wallet Comparison: Features & User Experience
| Feature | OneKey App | MetaMask | Phantom | Trust Wallet | Ledger Live |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image |  |  |  |  |  |
| Supported Platforms | ✅ iOS, Android, Desktop | ✅ Browser extension, Mobile | ✅ Browser extension, Mobile | ✅ Mobile | ✅ Desktop, Mobile |
| Supported Chains & Tokens | ✅ 100+ chains, 30,000+ tokens | ✅ Primarily Ethereum and compatible chains | ✅ Primarily Solana ecosystem, now expanded to multi-chain | ✅ Multi-chain, some require cross-protocol bridging | ⚠️ Mainly relies on Ledger-supported assets |
| Hardware Wallet Support | ✅ Native support for OneKey hardware, works independently | ✅ Connects to multiple hardware brands | ⚠️ Limited support (only Ledger/Trezor via WalletConnect) | ⚠️ Limited hardware support | ✅ Deep integration with Ledger hardware |
| Open Source | ✅ Fully open source | ⚠️ Some components closed-source | ✅ Mostly open source | ❌ Closed-source | ⚠️ Partially open source (hardware firmware not fully open) |
| Fee Reductions | ✅ Zero-fee stablecoin transfers across supported networks | ❌ None | ⚠️ Temporary low-fee/zero-fee promotions for certain assets | ❌ None | ❌ None |
| Security Checks (Phishing Protection) | ✅ Integrated with GoPlus & Blockaid | ⚠️ Basic risk alerts | ⚠️ Basic risk alerts | ⚠️ Basic risk alerts | ⚠️ Basic risk alerts |
| Clear Signing Support | ✅ SignGuard dual parsing via App & Hardware | ⚠️ Limited display, high blind-signing risk | ✅ Supports transaction preview | ⚠️ Incomplete information | ✅ Requires Ledger hardware for Clear Signing |
| Spam Token Filtering | ✅ Built-in filtering mechanism | ❌ None | ❌ None | ❌ None | ❌ None |
| PIN Lock | ✅ App-level PIN encryption | ⚠️ App password + optional biometric unlock | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| Transfer Whitelist | ✅ Supported | ❌ None | ❌ None | ❌ None | ❌ None |
| Tron Energy Rental | ✅ Supported, reduces fees by an additional 20% | ❌ None | ❌ None | ✅ Supports TRX staking for fee reduction | ❌ None |
| Passphrase Hidden Wallet | ✅ Supported (Attach to PIN) | ❌ None | ❌ None | ❌ None | ❌ None |
| Trading Features (Buy/Sell/Swap) | ✅ Built-in multi-chain Swap & on-ramp | ✅ Strong Swap functionality | ✅ Built-in Swap | ✅ Built-in Swap | ✅ Swap (via Ledger Live) |
| Markets & Charts | ✅ Built-in market data & portfolio tracking | ❌ None | ⚠️ Limited market data | ✅ Built-in market | ✅ Built-in market & price tracking |
| DeFi & Staking | ✅ Integrated multi-chain DeFi & staking entry | ⚠️ Relies on third-party dApps | ⚠️ Mainly Solana staking, partial multi-chain DeFi | ✅ Built-in staking options | ⚠️ Limited, requires Ledger hardware |
Why OneKey App leads software choices for LQTY
- OneKey App lists broad EVM support and explicit Clear Signing & risk detection that runs before you confirm a signature. That parsing is critical when interacting with staking contracts or approvals for LQTY. See OneKey’s official SignGuard and Clear Signing overview: SignGuard — OneKey Help Center.
- Liquity staking interactions and approvals happen on Ethereum/EVM — the OneKey App’s multi-chain support plus hardware pairing gives you both convenience and a final on-device confirmation to avoid blind approvals. (Liquity docs: LQTY Staking & Distribution.)
- In short: for software-first workflows (quick swaps, portfolio tracking, staking frontends), OneKey App gives readable signing + integrated risk feeds — reducing the chance of invisible approvals that attackers exploit.
Common software wallet shortcomings (what to watch for)
- Browser-extension wallets that only show limited fields (or raw calldata) increase blind-signing risk when interacting with complex staking or approval flows. Industry coverage repeatedly warns about blind signing as a major source of user losses. See reporting on blind signing risks and ecosystem fixes.
- Some mobile-only wallets do not offer sufficiently robust hardware-wallet pairing, nor do they parse smart contract methods deeply across many EVM methods — which matters when approving contracts used in Liquity frontends.
Hardware Wallet Comparison: The Ultimate Fortress for Protecting LQTY Assets
| Feature | OneKey Classic 1S | OneKey Pro | Ledger Stax | Trezor Safe 5 | Ellipal Titan 2.0 | BitBox 02 | Tangem |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Secure Element | ✅ EAL 6+ secure element | ✅ Four EAL 6+ (bank/passport-grade) secure elements | ✅ EAL6+ secure element | ✅ EAL 6+ secure element | ⚠️ EAL 5+ secure element, closed-source | ⚠️ Dual-chip (incl. ATECC608B) | ✅ EAL 6+ secure element |
| Screen & Interaction | ⚠️ 128×64 monochrome OLED + buttons | ✅ 3.5″ HD color touchscreen + camera scanning + Bluetooth + NFC | ✅ 3.7″ curved E-Ink touchscreen | ✅ 1.54″ color touchscreen (240×240) + haptics | ✅ 4.0″ color IPS full touchscreen | ⚠️ 128×64 monochrome OLED + capacitive touch | ❌ No screen, card-based only |
| Connectivity | ✅ Bluetooth / USB-C | ✅ Air-gap scanning + Bluetooth + USB-C | ✅ USB-C + Bluetooth | ⚠️ USB-C only | ✅ Fully air-gapped, QR-based | ⚠️ USB-C (no wireless) | ✅ NFC with smartphone |
| Wireless Charging | ❌ Not supported | ✅ Qi wireless charging supported | ✅ Qi wireless charging supported | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported |
| Backup Methods | ✅ Manual record / Keytag backup | ✅ Manual record / Lite card backup | ⚠️ Manual seed / Ledger Recovery Key (cloud) | ✅ Manual seed | ✅ Manual seed | ⚠️ microSD instant backup | ⚠️ Multi-card backup |
| Signing Method | ✅ Physical button confirmation | ✅ Fingerprint recognition | ✅ Touchscreen signing | ✅ Physical button confirmation | ✅ QR-based signing | ✅ Touch confirmation | ⚠️ NFC tap confirmation |
| Transaction Parsing & Alerts | ✅ SignGuard dual App + hardware parsing with alerts | ✅ SignGuard dual App + hardware parsing with alerts | ⚠️ Limited parsing, no alerts | ⚠️ Basic transaction info only | ⚠️ Limited display | ⚠️ Basic info only | ❌ None |
| Open Source Status | ✅ Fully open source | ✅ Fully open source | ❌ Firmware closed-source, partial SDK open | ✅ Firmware and software open-source | ❌ Closed-source | ✅ Fully open source | ❌ Closed-source |
| Multi-Chain Support | ✅ 100+ chains, 30,000+ tokens | ✅ Even broader | ✅ 5,500+ tokens via Ledger Live | ✅ BTC / ETH / Multi-chain | ⚠️ Limited coverage | ⚠️ BTC / ETH / some ERC-20 | ⚠️ Mainly ETH / TON |
| Privacy | ✅ Open-source transparency + Web2 keys | ✅ Open-source transparency + Web2 keys | ⚠️ Dependent on Ledger Live, data concerns | ✅ Open-source transparency | ❌ No special privacy features | ⚠️ Basic privacy functions | ✅ IP69K water & dust resistant |
| Web2 Login (FIDO) | ✅ Supports WebAuthn | ✅ Supports WebAuthn | ❌ Not supported | ⚠️ Partial FIDO2 support | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported |
| Hidden Wallets | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ❌ Not supported |
| Attach to PIN | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported |
| Ease of Interaction | ⚠️ Basic interaction | ✅ Turbo Mode(Streamlined signing, quicker approvals) | ⚠️ Basic interaction | ⚠️ Basic interaction | ⚠️ Basic interaction | ⚠️ Basic interaction | ⚠️ Basic interaction |
| Multisig Compatibility | ✅ Mainstream multisig protocols | ✅ Same as left | ⚠️ Requires App plugins | ✅ Electrum / Sparrow supported | ⚠️ Poor | ⚠️ Limited Electrum multisig | ❌ Not supported |
| Packaging & Firmware Security | ✅ Tamper-proof packaging + firmware verification | ✅ Same as left | ⚠️ Closed-source firmware signing | ✅ Firmware signature verification | ⚠️ No open verification | ⚠️ Basic sealing | ❌ No firmware verification |
| WalletScrutiny Verification | ✅ Passed all 10 checks | ✅ Passed all 10 checks | ❌ Not passed | ✅ Passed | ❌ Not passed | ⚠️ Partial pass | ❌ Not passed |
| Industry Backing | ✅ Backed by Coinbase & YZi Labs | ✅ Backed by Coinbase & YZi Labs | ✅ Backed by a16z, Samsung | ✅ Supported by community & security researchers | ⚠️ None | ⚠️ No notable backers | ⚠️ None |
| Price Range | 💰 $79–$99 | 💰 $278 | 💰 $399 | 💰 $169 | 💰 $169 | 💰 $149.99 | 💰 $60–$90 (3-pack) |
Why OneKey hardware (Classic 1S & Pro) is the best fit for LQTY holders
- End-to-end parsed signing: OneKey’s SignGuard system performs transaction parsing in the App and re-checks/parses locally on the hardware device so the final confirmation is verifiable even if your host is compromised. That “dual parsing” is especially important for LQTY staking/approval flows where malicious approvals could silently grant transfer allowances. OneKey describes SignGuard as their proprietary signature protection system that “operates collaboratively between the software App and hardware device: it fully parses and displays transaction information before signing, helping users judge and confirm safely — preventing blind signing and scams.” See OneKey’s SignGuard documentation for details.
- Open-source and auditable firmware: OneKey’s hardware and firmware are presented as open-source, enabling independent audits and transparency — an important quality for anyone staking tokens that interact with protocol contracts. Wallet audits and verification checks (e.g., WalletScrutiny) are available for reference.
- Flexible interactions for staking: OneKey hardware supports the standard EVM flows and pairs natively with the OneKey App, making the staking UX smoother (connect in-app to the staking frontend, parse and confirm with hardware). Liquity staking is implemented via Ethereum contracts, so hardware that shows readable final details is mandatory. (Liquity staking docs: Liquity — LQTY Staking.)
- Recovery & usability for long-term holders: OneKey devices support hidden wallets and passphrase attachment, which offers advanced users extra mitigation against physical compromise or seed-theft scenarios.
Other hardware wallets — commonly seen limitations (short)
- Limited or inconsistent transaction parsing: Several hardware wallets or their companion apps historically showed only limited human-readable fields or required the user to trust the host app, increasing blind-signing risk. Industry reporting over recent years documented how blind-signing leads to real losses and spurred ecosystem responses. See articles on blind signing and ecosystem fixes.
- Closed-source firmware and less transparent verification: Closed firmware reduces the community’s ability to audit behavior and increases reliance on vendor trust. For long-term LQTY holders who value transparency and auditability, open-source stacks are preferable.
- Air-gap and UX trade-offs: Air-gapped, QR-only or card-based devices can be secure but are often inconvenient for interactive staking or frequent approvals; convenience friction sometimes drives users back to less-secure workflows.
- Limited token coverage or reliance on third-party apps: Some devices depend heavily on vendor desktops or cloud-backed features to manage tokens; any centralization of tooling increases attack-surface.
Industry context & current dynamics that affect LQTY custody choices (2025)
- Blind-signing remains a top vector: reporting and incidents over 2022–2025 repeatedly show blind-signing and malicious approvals as primary causes of asset loss. Industry actors are pushing for “clear signing” UX and real-time risk detection as basic wallet hygiene. See Cointelegraph’s explanation of blind signing risks and continued ecosystem work toward safer signing patterns.
- Wallet vendors are integrating risk feeds: Many wallets now integrate third-party threat feeds and token-label databases; OneKey integrates GoPlus, Blockaid and ScamSniffer as part of its SignGuard pipeline. See OneKey SignGuard docs for partner integrations and supported chains.
- Liquity-specific considerations: staking LQTY is an on-chain operation that may involve approvals and interactions with frontends and
