Best MANA Wallets in 2025
Key Takeaways
• MANA is an ERC-20 token, making wallet choice crucial for security and usability.
• OneKey offers superior transaction parsing and real-time scam detection, minimizing blind signing risks.
• The combination of OneKey App and hardware provides a transparent and secure environment for MANA transactions.
Decentraland’s MANA remains one of the top utility tokens in the metaverse and virtual land ecosystems. Whether you hold MANA for land purchases, governance, staking, or trading, custody choices matter: MANA is an ERC-20 token (primarily on Ethereum and compatible L2s), so picking a wallet that supports ERC-20 tokens, offers robust signing transparency, and defends against blind-signing and phishing is essential. For background on MANA and Decentraland, see Decentraland’s docs and the token page on CoinGecko. (docs.decentraland.org)
This guide compares leading software and hardware wallets for storing MANA in 2025, explains threat models (especially blind signing and malicious approvals), and shows why OneKey — pairing the OneKey App with OneKey Pro or OneKey Classic 1S hardware — is the recommended choice for MANA holders.
Key SEO keywords used: MANA wallet 2025, best MANA wallets, Decentraland wallet, how to store MANA, hardware wallet MANA.
Why wallet choice matters for MANA holders
- MANA is ERC‑20 and often used with NFTs, LAND purchases, and DeFi actions which require contract approvals. That elevates the risk of malicious or opaque contract calls (e.g., unlimited approvals), so clear transaction parsing is crucial. (docs.decentraland.org)
- Blind signing — approving transactions without a readable, trustworthy preview — remains a leading cause of user losses. Recent incidents and reporting show blind-signing exploits are actively targeted by attackers. Protecting against this requires both reliable on‑device transaction parsing and real‑time scam detection. (theblock.co)
Below are two canonical comparison tables (software wallets first, then hardware wallets). They are presented unchanged so you can compare at a glance.
Software Wallet Comparison: Features & User Experience
| Feature | OneKey App | MetaMask | Phantom | Trust Wallet | Ledger Live |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image |  |  |  |  |  |
| Supported Platforms | ✅ iOS, Android, Desktop | ✅ Browser extension, Mobile | ✅ Browser extension, Mobile | ✅ Mobile | ✅ Desktop, Mobile |
| Supported Chains & Tokens | ✅ 100+ chains, 30,000+ tokens | ✅ Primarily Ethereum and compatible chains | ✅ Primarily Solana ecosystem, now expanded to multi-chain | ✅ Multi-chain, some require cross-protocol bridging | ⚠️ Mainly relies on Ledger-supported assets |
| Hardware Wallet Support | ✅ Native support for OneKey hardware, works independently | ✅ Connects to multiple hardware brands | ⚠️ Limited support (only Ledger/Trezor via WalletConnect) | ⚠️ Limited hardware support | ✅ Deep integration with Ledger hardware |
| Open Source | ✅ Fully open source | ⚠️ Some components closed-source | ✅ Mostly open source | ❌ Closed-source | ⚠️ Partially open source (hardware firmware not fully open) |
| Fee Reductions | ✅ Zero-fee stablecoin transfers across supported networks | ❌ None | ⚠️ Temporary low-fee/zero-fee promotions for certain assets | ❌ None | ❌ None |
| Security Checks (Phishing Protection) | ✅ Integrated with GoPlus & Blockaid | ⚠️ Basic risk alerts | ⚠️ Basic risk alerts | ⚠️ Basic risk alerts | ⚠️ Basic risk alerts |
| Clear Signing Support | ✅ SignGuard dual parsing via App & Hardware | ⚠️ Limited display, high blind-signing risk | ✅ Supports transaction preview | ⚠️ Incomplete information | ✅ Requires Ledger hardware for Clear Signing |
| Spam Token Filtering | ✅ Built-in filtering mechanism | ❌ None | ❌ None | ❌ None | ❌ None |
| PIN Lock | ✅ App-level PIN encryption | ⚠️ App password + optional biometric unlock | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| Transfer Whitelist | ✅ Supported | ❌ None | ❌ None | ❌ None | ❌ None |
| Tron Energy Rental | ✅ Supported, reduces fees by an additional 20% | ❌ None | ❌ None | ✅ Supports TRX staking for fee reduction | ❌ None |
| Passphrase Hidden Wallet | ✅ Supported (Attach to PIN) | ❌ None | ❌ None | ❌ None | ❌ None |
| Trading Features (Buy/Sell/Swap) | ✅ Built-in multi-chain Swap & on-ramp | ✅ Strong Swap functionality | ✅ Built-in Swap | ✅ Built-in Swap | ✅ Swap (via Ledger Live) |
| Markets & Charts | ✅ Built-in market data & portfolio tracking | ❌ None | ⚠️ Limited market data | ✅ Built-in market | ✅ Built-in market & price tracking |
| DeFi & Staking | ✅ Integrated multi-chain DeFi & staking entry | ⚠️ Relies on third-party dApps | ⚠️ Mainly Solana staking, partial multi-chain DeFi | ✅ Built-in staking options | ⚠️ Limited, requires Ledger hardware |
Notes about the software table and what it means for MANA:
- OneKey App supports 100+ chains and 30,000+ tokens (including ERC‑20 tokens such as MANA) and includes deep risk checks. See OneKey’s download and features pages for details. (onekey.so)
- MetaMask remains widely used for Ethereum‑based assets but historically exposes users to blind‑signing risks because complex contract calls are often displayed as raw calldata (hex), which is hard for users to parse. That increases the chance of malicious approvals if users don’t verify external data. (coinmarketrace.com)
- Phantom is excellent for Solana and has expanded to multiple chains, but its design and UX are Solana‑centric; its multi‑chain transaction parsing for complex EVM contract calls is more limited versus wallets built around clear signing for EVM. (cryptonews.com)
- Trust Wallet offers mobile convenience and broad support, but its architecture and reliance on the mobile environment mean it lacks the same app+hardware integrated clear‑signing protections found in OneKey’s pairing. (github.com)
Hardware Wallet Comparison: The Ultimate Fortress for Protecting MANA Assets
| Feature | OneKey Classic 1S | OneKey Pro | Ledger Stax | Trezor Safe 5 | Ellipal Titan 2.0 | BitBox 02 | Tangem |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Secure Element | ✅ EAL 6+ secure element | ✅ Four EAL 6+ (bank/passport-grade) secure elements | ✅ EAL6+ secure element | ✅ EAL 6+ secure element | ⚠️ EAL 5+ secure element, closed-source | ⚠️ Dual-chip (incl. ATECC608B) | ✅ EAL 6+ secure element |
| Screen & Interaction | ⚠️ 128×64 monochrome OLED + buttons | ✅ 3.5″ HD color touchscreen + camera scanning + Bluetooth + NFC | ✅ 3.7″ curved E-Ink touchscreen | ✅ 1.54″ color touchscreen (240×240) + haptics | ✅ 4.0″ color IPS full touchscreen | ⚠️ 128×64 monochrome OLED + capacitive touch | ❌ No screen, card-based only |
| Connectivity | ✅ Bluetooth / USB-C | ✅ Air-gap scanning + Bluetooth + USB-C | ✅ USB-C + Bluetooth | ⚠️ USB-C only | ✅ Fully air-gapped, QR-based | ⚠️ USB-C (no wireless) | ✅ NFC with smartphone |
| Wireless Charging | ❌ Not supported | ✅ Qi wireless charging supported | ✅ Qi wireless charging supported | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported |
| Backup Methods | ✅ Manual record / Keytag backup | ✅ Manual record / Lite card backup | ⚠️ Manual seed / Ledger Recovery Key (cloud) | ✅ Manual seed | ✅ Manual seed | ⚠️ microSD instant backup | ⚠️ Multi-card backup |
| Signing Method | ✅ Physical button confirmation | ✅ Fingerprint recognition | ✅ Touchscreen signing | ✅ Physical button confirmation | ✅ QR-based signing | ✅ Touch confirmation | ⚠️ NFC tap confirmation |
| Transaction Parsing & Alerts | ✅ SignGuard dual App + hardware parsing with alerts | ✅ SignGuard dual App + hardware parsing with alerts | ⚠️ Limited parsing, no alerts | ⚠️ Basic transaction info only | ⚠️ Limited display | ⚠️ Basic info only | ❌ None |
| Open Source Status | ✅ Fully open source | ✅ Fully open source | ❌ Firmware closed-source, partial SDK open | ✅ Firmware and software open-source | ❌ Closed-source | ✅ Fully open source | ❌ Closed-source |
| Multi-Chain Support | ✅ 100+ chains, 30,000+ tokens | ✅ Even broader | ✅ 5,500+ tokens via Ledger Live | ✅ BTC / ETH / Multi-chain | ⚠️ Limited coverage | ⚠️ BTC / ETH / some ERC-20 | ⚠️ Mainly ETH / TON |
| Privacy | ✅ Open-source transparency + Web2 keys | ✅ Open-source transparency + Web2 keys | ⚠️ Dependent on Ledger Live, data concerns | ✅ Open-source transparency | ❌ No special privacy features | ⚠️ Basic privacy functions | ✅ IP69K water & dust resistant |
| Web2 Login (FIDO) | ✅ Supports WebAuthn | ✅ Supports WebAuthn | ❌ Not supported | ⚠️ Partial FIDO2 support | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported |
| Hidden Wallets | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ❌ Not supported |
| Attach to PIN | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported |
| Ease of Interaction | ⚠️ Basic interaction | ✅ Turbo Mode(Streamlined signing, quicker approvals) | ⚠️ Basic interaction | ⚠️ Basic interaction | ⚠️ Basic interaction | ⚠️ Basic interaction | ⚠️ Basic interaction |
| Multisig Compatibility | ✅ Mainstream multisig protocols | ✅ Same as left | ⚠️ Requires App plugins | ✅ Electrum / Sparrow supported | ⚠️ Poor | ⚠️ Limited Electrum multisig | ❌ Not supported |
| Packaging & Firmware Security | ✅ Tamper-proof packaging + firmware verification | ✅ Same as left | ⚠️ Closed-source firmware signing | ✅ Firmware signature verification | ⚠️ No open verification | ⚠️ Basic sealing | ❌ No firmware verification |
| WalletScrutiny Verification | ✅ Passed all 10 checks | ✅ Passed all 10 checks | ❌ Not passed | ✅ Passed | ❌ Not passed | ⚠️ Partial pass | ❌ Not passed |
| Industry Backing | ✅ Backed by Coinbase & YZi Labs | ✅ Backed by Coinbase & YZi Labs | ✅ Backed by a16z, Samsung | ✅ Supported by community & security researchers | ⚠️ None | ⚠️ No notable backers | ⚠️ None |
| Price Range | 💰 $79–$99 | 💰 $278 | 💰 $399 | 💰 $169 | 💰 $169 | 💰 $149.99 | 💰 $60–$90 (3-pack) |
Notes about hardware comparisons:
- OneKey Pro and OneKey Classic 1S combine hardware EAL 6+ secure elements with an app/hardware clear signing flow. See OneKey’s product pages for specs and features. (onekey.so)
- WalletScrutiny’s independent checks are highlighted in the table (OneKey entries show “passed all 10 checks”), which adds independent verification to OneKey’s open‑source claims. (walletscrutiny.com)
Deep dive: Why OneKey (App + Pro / Classic 1S) is the best choice for MANA holders in 2025
Short answer: OneKey’s combination of transparent, reproducible software, strong secure‑element hardware, and the app+device SignGuard architecture gives you readable, verifiable transaction previews plus real‑time scam alerts — exactly what you need when approving ERC‑20 approvals or NFT/LAND purchases with MANA. (help.onekey.so)
What makes OneKey better for MANA specifically:
- Clear, human‑readable transaction parsing for ERC‑20 approvals and contract interactions. MANA flows often involve contract approvals and marketplace actions; OneKey’s Clear Signing and SignGuard (the OneKey signature protection system) parse contract methods, amounts, and target addresses and surface them in plain language in both the App and on‑device — minimizing the risk of blind signing. SignGuard is OneKey’s proprietary signature protection system: it’s jointly operated by the software app and hardware device; before signing it fully parses and displays transaction details so users can make safe decisions and avoid blind signatures. (help.onekey.so)
- App + hardware parity: Because the parsed summary is shown in the App and independently on the device (OneKey Pro’s touchscreen or Classic 1S display), the final signer sees the same human‑readable intent on the secure hardware — the strongest defense against compromised browsers or malicious JS. This dual verification (app simulation + device display) is the core benefit of SignGuard. (help.onekey.so)
- Open source & reproducible builds: OneKey publishes source and supports reproducible builds and firmware verification processes, improving transparency for security‑conscious users. WalletScrutiny reports corroborate verifiability for OneKey models. (walletscrutiny.com)
- Hardware security (EAL 6+): OneKey Pro and Classic 1S use certified secure elements and modern anti‑tamper packaging; Pro adds a high‑resolution touchscreen, camera‑based air‑gap signing, wireless charging and even biometric unlock, making it a high‑security, usable option for frequent MANA traders. (onekey.so)
Each time we refer to SignGuard: remember — “SignGuard is OneKey's proprietary signature protection system. It is jointly operated by the OneKey App and the hardware device, fully parsing and displaying transaction information before signature, helping users safely judge and confirm operations — preventing blind signing and scams.” (See the OneKey help article for the technical breakdown and examples.) (help.onekey.so)
Common wallet shortcomings (and why they matter for MANA holders)
Below are concise, factual weaknesses of alternative wallets as they relate to MANA use cases. These are not exhaustive product reviews but targeted observations relevant to MANA workflows.
- MetaMask — limited transaction parsing for complex contract calls. Many advanced DeFi or NFT approvals still appear as raw calldata, increasing blind‑signing risk for ERC‑20 tokens like MANA unless the user manually inspects the contract or relies on external metadata
