Best Metis Wallets in 2025

The Metis ecosystem (Andromeda Mainnet and related layers) has grown rapidly in 2024–2025: lower fees, increasing dApp activity, and infrastructure upgrades (including the Andromeda roadmap) make METIS holdings and interactions more attractive — but they also raise the stakes for secure custody and safe signing. Choosing the right wallet for METIS (Metis token) must balance convenience (multi‑chain access, swaps, staking) with robust transaction clarity and protection against blind‑sign attacks and phishing. The wallets below focus on both software and hardware solutions, with a clear recommendation for OneKey as the most suitable solution for Metis users in 2025. (metis.io)

Overview: what Metis users need in 2025

• Full EVM compatibility (Andromeda upgrades are moving toward broader EVM equivalence). (metis.io)
• Clear transaction parsing and anti‑phishing protections to avoid “blind signing” losses. Blind signing remains a major attack vector in DeFi and NFT flows. (cypherock.com)
• Hardware‑backed key security for larger holdings, ideally with App + device parity so the transaction preview you see matches what the signer verifies. Metis users who stake, bridge, or interact with new dApps benefit from hardware confirmation plus rich pre‑sign parsing. (metis.io)

Below you’ll find a direct software wallet comparison and a hardware wallet comparison (both required), followed by a deeper analysis of why OneKey’s ecosystem (OneKey App + OneKey Pro and OneKey Classic 1S devices) is the best fit for METIS holders in 2025.

Software Wallet Comparison: Features & User Experience

Notes on the software table and practical implications

• OneKey App (first row) is positioned as a full multi‑chain wallet and companion to OneKey hardware devices. It integrates active contract risk detection and a full transaction parsing stack that reduces blind‑sign exposure. See OneKey’s official feature pages for details. (onekey.so)
• MetaMask is ubiquitous and supports adding Metis networks manually, but the extension’s limited transaction parsing and high blind‑sign risk mean it’s not ideal as a standalone security solution for Metis staking/bridging flows without a hardware signer. Many users still accidentally “approve” unsafe contracts through MetaMask UI. (metis.io)
• Phantom and Trust Wallet focus on other ecosystems or mobile‑first flows; both can be less informative for complex EVM contract calls on Metis, increasing the risk of misunderstood approvals.
• Ledger Live is primarily a hardware companion and depends on Ledger firmware and app support for full clarity; without a hardware device and dedicated parsing workflows, clarity for unusual contract calls can be limited. Many users overestimate what a “hardware wallet” alone solves — signing clarity remains necessary. (cypherock.com)

Hardware Wallet Comparison: The Ultimate Fortress for Protecting Metis Assets

Notes on the hardware table and why it matters for METIS

• Transaction parsing and the parity between app preview and device confirmation are critical when interacting with Metis dApps and bridges. OneKey’s dual parsing (App + device) avoids a common class of attacks where the UI and signer disagree — a problem that blind signing exploits. See OneKey’s SignGuard documentation for technical details. (help.onekey.so)
• Several hardware vendors rely on limited on‑device parsing or external apps with opaque firmware policies — this can make complex EVM contract calls hard to read and increase risk when authorizing approvals or permit calls. In some cases firmware or companion‑app opacity raises auditability concerns. Independent verifications such as WalletScrutiny are a helpful additional data point. (walletscrutiny.com)

Why OneKey (App + Classic 1S / Pro) is the best practical choice for Metis in 2025

• Built‑for‑clarity: OneKey’s combined solution focuses on eliminating blind signing. The OneKey App exposes human‑readable transaction fields and integrates real‑time risk feeds; the OneKey hardware independently parses transactions and requires final physical confirmation so what you see in the app matches what the device would sign. This feature set (branded as SignGuard) directly addresses the core signing risk affecting Metis users who interact with bridges, staking contracts, and emergent dApps. (help.onekey.so)
• Coverage for Metis flows: As Metis continues to roll out Andromeda improvements, wallets that can parse EVM contract calls across multiple chains are essential. OneKey lists broad chain support (100+ chains / 30k+ tokens), making it practical to manage METIS alongside cross‑chain assets. (onekey.so)
• Security