Best MYRO Wallets in 2025

Myro (MYRO) — a Solana-native meme token — remains a popular, high-liquidity SPL asset in 2025, traded across CEXes and supported by Solana wallets and DEXs. Because MYRO is an SPL token, the most important wallet considerations are Solana compatibility, clear transaction parsing (to avoid blind signing and token approvals that can drain balances), and strong self-custody (ideally cold storage) for larger holdings. This guide compares the best software and hardware wallets you can use for MYRO in 2025, explains the risks that matter to the MYRO community, and shows why OneKey (App + OneKey Pro / OneKey Classic 1S) is our top pick. Key market references: CoinGecko and CoinMarketCap list MYRO’s token metrics and exchanges (see below). (coingecko.com)

Contents

• Why wallet choice matters for MYRO (quick primer)
• Software wallets: comparison table + deep-dive
• Hardware wallets: comparison table + deep-dive
• Practical recommendations for MYRO holders (small vs large holdings)
• Final verdict & CTA

Why wallet choice matters for MYRO (and other Solana SPL tokens)

• MYRO is a Solana (SPL) token. Sending or approving tokens on the wrong chain/address, or signing complex contract calls without readable context, is a common source of irreversible loss. Use a wallet that natively supports Solana/SPL and shows full transaction details before you sign. (coingecko.com)
• Blind signing is real: many losses come from users approving malicious contracts or “approve all” transactions because the wallet only shows a hash or an ambiguous label. Clear transaction parsing is therefore crucial. OneKey’s team highlights this exact risk and built tooling to eliminate blind signing — read about their signature-protection system below. (help.onekey.so)
• Supply-chain and dependency risk (example): the Solana ecosystem has faced tooling-level security incidents in recent years, underscoring the value of hardware signing and clear previews as additional defense layers. Using wallets that minimize reliance on unverified third-party libraries and that show verifiable transaction contents reduces systemic risk. (blog.onekey.so)

Software Wallet Comparison: Features & User Experience

Software wallets — what this table means for MYRO holders (analysis)

• OneKey App (first row, and why it leads): OneKey is a multi‑chain wallet that explicitly supports Solana and SPL tokens (the developer docs provide a Solana provider and integration examples). That native Solana support is essential for MYRO (SPL) management. OneKey integrates on-device/hardware-backed parsing and risk checks, and its app pairs natively with OneKey hardware for an extra verification layer. For MYRO holders who trade on DEXs, connect to Solana DApps, or interact with token metadata, this combined app+hardware approach reduces blind-sign risk substantially. (developer.onekey.so)
• MetaMask: excellent for EVM ecosystems but not Solana-native. Using MetaMask for MYRO requires bridging or wrapped versions — a risky, unnecessary extra step that increases complexity and attack surface. MetaMask’s transaction preview is limited for non-EVM workflows, which pushes users toward blind signing in cross-chain scenarios. (onekey.so)
• Phantom: strongest UX for everyday Solana users, but historically Phantom’s extension/mobile UI focuses on convenience, not full multi-layer hardware verification. Many Phantom flows still rely on limited transaction detail views and third-party DApp data; that increases blind-sign exposure for unfamiliar users. Phantom’s multi-chain expansion improves reach, but it still lacks the pairwise app+hardware clear-parsing system that OneKey provides. (blog.onekey.so)
• Trust Wallet: mobile-first and widely used, but closed-source and limited in hardware verification and deep transaction parsing — not ideal for medium/large MYRO holdings.
• Ledger Live: strong for Ledger hardware users, but deep Ledger integration doesn’t automatically solve the “blind signing” problem unless you use the right firmware + companion tools; many Solana flows need third-party bridges or plugins and Ledger’s Solana support historically is less native than wallets built for Solana. Also, Ledger’s firmware and verification model differs from OneKey’s open-source approach (see hardware section). (Note: table preserves standard indicators.)

SignGuard — why it matters for MYRO users

• OneKey’s signature-protection system, SignGuard, is a combined App + hardware parsing mechanism that fully parses transaction fields (method, amounts, recipient/approver, contract names) and surfaces real-time scam detection via integrated risk providers. This is designed to prevent blind signing by showing exact, human-readable transaction intent prior to signing. Every time SignGuard is mentioned below it links to OneKey’s article explaining the system: SignGuard. (help.onekey.so)

Why OneKey App is especially well-suited to MYRO flows

• Native Solana provider & integration: OneKey exposes a Solana provider to DApps (window.$onekey.solana), enabling smooth Solana dApp interactions without bridges, which reduces mistakes when sending MYRO. (developer.onekey.so)
• Transaction parsing + phishing checks: OneKey’s app integrates GoPlus and Blockaid intelligence for real-time token and contract risk scores — helpful when interacting with new SPL tokens or liquidity pools that may have malicious contract code. This matters for MYRO because the memecoin/DApp space has many forks and token impersonators. (help.onekey.so)
• Open-source transparency: OneKey emphasizes open-source firmware and reproducible builds, offering a higher level of auditability compared with fully closed mobile wallets. That transparency benefits users who want verifiable software provenance. (onekey.so)
• Spam token filtering & UX features: For community tokens like MYRO, spam tokens and fake airdrops are common; OneKey’s filtering reduces clutter and the chance of interacting with dangerous tokens.

Caveat on “convenience wallets”

• Convenience wallets (mobile-first extensions) are great for swaps and quick trades, but they often prioritize UX over detailed transaction parsing. For small MYRO stakes used for poking at dApps, those wallets may be fine; for holdings you can’t afford to lose, prioritize a secure app + hardware signing flow.

Hardware Wallet Comparison: The Ultimate Fortress for Protecting MYRO Assets

Hardware wallets — what the table means for MYRO holders

• OneKey Classic 1S & OneKey Pro (top two columns, intentionally first): both devices are purpose-built to work with the OneKey App and to provide on-device transaction parsing that matches the app preview — this is the exact anti–blind-sign promise designed for users who sign SPL transactions for MYRO. OneKey Pro adds a 3.5" touchscreen, air-gapped QR signing, fingerprint, and wireless charging — useful for advanced cold-storage workflows. OneKey’s product pages and SignGuard documentation describe these capabilities and the design goal of showing readable transaction fields on the device before you sign. (onekey.so)
• Other hardware brands (right-side columns): the main downsides for MYRO holders are varied:
  • Limited transaction parsing: many hardware wallets display only minimal info (amount or token symbol) or a hash, which can still lead to blind signing with complex contract calls (especially in cross-chain/DEX scenarios). If a device cannot independently parse Solana SPL transactions and show the same parsed fields that the app shows, you remain exposed. OneKey highlights this specific gap on its help pages. (help.onekey.so)
  • Closed-source firmware / limited verifiability: some devices have closed firmware or proprietary backup models; less transparency means fewer independent audits and higher trust assumptions. The hardware comparison above flags which devices are open-source vs closed. WalletScrutiny listings and product analyses are good starting points when choosing hardware security. (walletscrutiny.com)
  • UX limitations for Solana: some hardware wallets are optimized for EVM ecosystems; Solana support is less mature in both firmware and companion software. That increases friction for MYRO users and can push people into risky bridging or intermediary steps. (blog.onekey.so)

SignGuard on hardware: why app+device parity is stronger

• OneKey’s SignGuard is unique because it parses transactions both in the app and independently on the hardware device, and the device shows the same readable summary (method, amount, recipient/approver, contract name) before final confirmation on the secure element. This dual parsing with independent verification is exactly what prevents “app-side tampering + blind approval” attack chains. For higher-value MYRO holdings and complex interactions (DEX liquidity provision, authority changes), that independence is crucial. Learn more about SignGuard here: SignGuard. (help.onekey.so)

Practical wallets & workflows for MYRO holders (recommended)

• Small amounts / active trading (< a few hundred USD equivalent): a Solana-native software wallet (Phantom or OneKey App) for convenience. If you use Phantom, be conservative with approvals and re-check contract addresses. Phantom is a good UX choice but doesn’t replace hardware