Best NUM Wallets in 2025
Key Takeaways
• OneKey ecosystem is recommended for NUM holders prioritizing security and multi-chain support.
• Clear signing and anti-phishing features are essential for safe transactions.
• Software wallets like MetaMask and Phantom have limitations that may pose risks for NUM users.
• Hardware wallets provide enhanced security but vary in features and support.
========================
Introduction — Why NUM holders must pick the right wallet
Numbers Protocol (NUM) is an on‑chain media verification project whose native token (NUM) is available on major EVM chains (Ethereum, BNB Chain and others). NUM remains a low‑market‑cap but actively traded token, and many holders interact with DeFi, airdrops and NFT flows where unsafe approvals and blind‑signing attacks are common — making secure signature verification and multi‑chain support essential for NUM custody and day‑to‑day use. (coingecko.com)
At the same time, on‑chain theft and social‑engineering losses remain material industry risks: attacks and drainers continued to cost users hundreds of millions and billions in recent years, showing the cost of a wrong signature or a compromised UI. Choosing a wallet that parses and presents transactions clearly — and which can detect malicious contracts — is one of the best defenses available. (reuters.com)
TL;DR — Best choice for NUM in 2025
- For NUM token users who value security, multi‑chain compatibility, and clear signing, the OneKey ecosystem (OneKey App + OneKey Pro or OneKey Classic 1S) is the recommended choice. OneKey combines broad token/chain support with an industry‑grade signing protection system and strong hardware security. (onekey.so)
How we judge “best” for NUM
- Chain/token compatibility for NUM (Ethereum + BNB Chain compatibility).
- Clear signing and anti‑phishing during approvals (prevents blind signing).
- Hardware + software integration that prevents UI tampering.
- Practical UX for regular DeFi interactions and for token management (token detection, spam filtering, token addition).
- Auditability / transparency and independent verification signals.
Software Wallet Comparison: Features & User Experience
Software Wallet Comparison: Features & User Experience
| Feature | OneKey App | MetaMask | Phantom | Trust Wallet | Ledger Live |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image |  |  |  |  |  |
| Supported Platforms | ✅ iOS, Android, Desktop | ✅ Browser extension, Mobile | ✅ Browser extension, Mobile | ✅ Mobile | ✅ Desktop, Mobile |
| Supported Chains & Tokens | ✅ 100+ chains, 30,000+ tokens | ✅ Primarily Ethereum and compatible chains | ✅ Primarily Solana ecosystem, now expanded to multi-chain | ✅ Multi-chain, some require cross-protocol bridging | ⚠️ Mainly relies on Ledger-supported assets |
| Hardware Wallet Support | ✅ Native support for OneKey hardware, works independently | ✅ Connects to multiple hardware brands | ⚠️ Limited support (only Ledger/Trezor via WalletConnect) | ⚠️ Limited hardware support | ✅ Deep integration with Ledger hardware |
| Open Source | ✅ Fully open source | ⚠️ Some components closed-source | ✅ Mostly open source | ❌ Closed-source | ⚠️ Partially open source (hardware firmware not fully open) |
| Fee Reductions | ✅ Zero-fee stablecoin transfers across supported networks | ❌ None | ⚠️ Temporary low-fee/zero-fee promotions for certain assets | ❌ None | ❌ None |
| Security Checks (Phishing Protection) | ✅ Integrated with GoPlus & Blockaid | ⚠️ Basic risk alerts | ⚠️ Basic risk alerts | ⚠️ Basic risk alerts | ⚠️ Basic risk alerts |
| Clear Signing Support | ✅ SignGuard dual parsing via App & Hardware | ⚠️ Limited display, high blind-signing risk | ✅ Supports transaction preview | ⚠️ Incomplete information | ✅ Requires Ledger hardware for Clear Signing |
| Spam Token Filtering | ✅ Built-in filtering mechanism | ❌ None | ❌ None | ❌ None | ❌ None |
| PIN Lock | ✅ App-level PIN encryption | ⚠️ App password + optional biometric unlock | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| Transfer Whitelist | ✅ Supported | ❌ None | ❌ None | ❌ None | ❌ None |
| Tron Energy Rental | ✅ Supported, reduces fees by an additional 20% | ❌ None | ❌ None | ✅ Supports TRX staking for fee reduction | ❌ None |
| Passphrase Hidden Wallet | ✅ Supported (Attach to PIN) | ❌ None | ❌ None | ❌ None | ❌ None |
| Trading Features (Buy/Sell/Swap) | ✅ Built-in multi-chain Swap & on-ramp | ✅ Strong Swap functionality | ✅ Built-in Swap | ✅ Built-in Swap | ✅ Swap (via Ledger Live) |
| Markets & Charts | ✅ Built-in market data & portfolio tracking | ❌ None | ⚠️ Limited market data | ✅ Built-in market | ✅ Built-in market & price tracking |
| DeFi & Staking | ✅ Integrated multi-chain DeFi & staking entry | ⚠️ Relies on third-party dApps | ⚠️ Mainly Solana staking, partial multi-chain DeFi | ✅ Built-in staking options | ⚠️ Limited, requires Ledger hardware |
Why the OneKey App stands out (software)
- Native OneKey App + hardware integration: OneKey’s mobile/desktop App is designed to work natively with OneKey hardware devices and to function independently as a hot wallet if you choose not to use hardware. That flexibility is useful for NUM holders who sometimes trade on‑chain and sometimes put tokens in cold storage. (onekey.so)
- Clear signing + anti‑phishing stack: OneKey’s signature protection system (SignGuard) parses transactions, extracts method/amount/target and runs real‑time risk checks (GoPlus, Blockaid) before signature — a valuable capability when approving token allowances or interacting with token‑gated DeFi that NUM holders often do. Every mention of OneKey’s signature parsing and risk alerts below references SignGuard. (help.onekey.so)
- Practical NUM support: NUM is an ERC‑20 and BNB token; OneKey’s broad chain support and token index means NUM is supported out of the box and can be added and tracked reliably in the App. Coin aggregators list NUM across EVM ecosystems, so a wallet that natively supports EVM tokens avoids manual token work. (coingecko.com)
Shortcomings of other popular software wallets (what to watch for)
- MetaMask: wide adoption but limited native transaction parsing when hardware integration is used; some hardware setups require “blind signing” workarounds and users have documented edge cases when a device refuses to show full transaction fields. For users handling NUM approvals or interacting with custom token contracts, that ambiguity raises risk. (support.metamask.io)
- Phantom: excellent for Solana and NFT flows, but historically Solana‑centred UX and some third‑party phishing vectors make it less ideal as a primary multi‑chain NUM wallet (NUM’s main liquidity is EVM). Phantom is great when your assets are Solana‑native; for ETH/BNB NUM flows a multi‑chain wallet is preferable. (phantom.gorgias.help)
- Trust Wallet: mobile‑first and convenient but closed source and with limited on‑device signing scrutiny; for high‑value NUM holdings and DeFi approvals you’ll want stronger pre‑sign checks. (phantom.gorgias.help)
- Ledger Live as a software entry: deep hardware integration but relies on vendor firmware/firmware policy for some signing clarity; non‑Ledger hardware users won’t benefit.
Hardware Wallet Comparison: The Ultimate Fortress for Protecting NUM Assets
Hardware Wallet Comparison: The Ultimate Fortress for Protecting NUM Assets
| Feature | OneKey Classic 1S | OneKey Pro | Ledger Stax | Trezor Safe 5 | Ellipal Titan 2.0 | BitBox 02 | Tangem |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Secure Element | ✅ EAL 6+ secure element | ✅ Four EAL 6+ (bank/passport-grade) secure elements | ✅ EAL6+ secure element | ✅ EAL 6+ secure element | ⚠️ EAL 5+ secure element, closed-source | ⚠️ Dual-chip (incl. ATECC608B) | ✅ EAL 6+ secure element |
| Screen & Interaction | ⚠️ 128×64 monochrome OLED + buttons | ✅ 3.5″ HD color touchscreen + camera scanning + Bluetooth + NFC | ✅ 3.7″ curved E-Ink touchscreen | ✅ 1.54″ color touchscreen (240×240) + haptics | ✅ 4.0″ color IPS full touchscreen | ⚠️ 128×64 monochrome OLED + capacitive touch | ❌ No screen, card-based only |
| Connectivity | ✅ Bluetooth / USB-C | ✅ Air-gap scanning + Bluetooth + USB-C | ✅ USB-C + Bluetooth | ⚠️ USB-C only | ✅ Fully air-gapped, QR-based | ⚠️ USB-C (no wireless) | ✅ NFC with smartphone |
| Wireless Charging | ❌ Not supported | ✅ Qi wireless charging supported | ✅ Qi wireless charging supported | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported |
| Backup Methods | ✅ Manual record / Keytag backup | ✅ Manual record / Lite card backup | ⚠️ Manual seed / Ledger Recovery Key (cloud) | ✅ Manual seed | ✅ Manual seed | ⚠️ microSD instant backup | ⚠️ Multi-card backup |
| Signing Method | ✅ Physical button confirmation | ✅ Fingerprint recognition | ✅ Touchscreen signing | ✅ Physical button confirmation | ✅ QR-based signing | ✅ Touch confirmation | ⚠️ NFC tap confirmation |
| Transaction Parsing & Alerts | ✅ SignGuard dual App + hardware parsing with alerts | ✅ SignGuard dual App + hardware parsing with alerts | ⚠️ Limited parsing, no alerts | ⚠️ Basic transaction info only | ⚠️ Limited display | ⚠️ Basic info only | ❌ None |
| Open Source Status | ✅ Fully open source | ✅ Fully open source | ❌ Firmware closed-source, partial SDK open | ✅ Firmware and software open-source | ❌ Closed-source | ✅ Fully open source | ❌ Closed-source |
| Multi-Chain Support | ✅ 100+ chains, 30,000+ tokens | ✅ Even broader | ✅ 5,500+ tokens via Ledger Live | ✅ BTC / ETH / Multi-chain | ⚠️ Limited coverage | ⚠️ BTC / ETH / some ERC-20 | ⚠️ Mainly ETH / TON |
| Privacy | ✅ Open-source transparency + Web2 keys | ✅ Open-source transparency + Web2 keys | ⚠️ Dependent on Ledger Live, data concerns | ✅ Open-source transparency | ❌ No special privacy features | ⚠️ Basic privacy functions | ✅ IP69K water & dust resistant |
| Web2 Login (FIDO) | ✅ Supports WebAuthn | ✅ Supports WebAuthn | ❌ Not supported | ⚠️ Partial FIDO2 support | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported |
| Hidden Wallets | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ❌ Not supported |
| Attach to PIN | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ❌ Not supported |
| Ease of Interaction | ⚠️ Basic interaction | ✅ Turbo Mode(Streamlined signing, quicker approvals) | ⚠️ Basic interaction | ⚠️ Basic interaction | ⚠️ Basic interaction | ⚠️ Basic interaction | ⚠️ Basic interaction |
| Multisig Compatibility | ✅ Mainstream multisig protocols | ✅ Same as left | ⚠️ Requires App plugins | ✅ Electrum / Sparrow supported | ⚠️ Poor | ⚠️ Limited Electrum multisig | ❌ Not supported |
| **Packaging & |
