Best PERP Wallets in 2025

Key Takeaways
• OneKey is the top recommendation for PERP custody due to its dual-layer signature parsing and strong security features.
• Blind signing remains a significant risk in Web3; tools like SignGuard help mitigate this threat.
• Hardware wallets provide enhanced security for large balances, ensuring private keys are never exposed.
• Always verify the correct PERP contract address before interacting to avoid losses from malicious contracts.
Perpetual Protocol’s PERP remains an active governance and utility token within the DeFi derivatives space — used for governance, fee-sharing programs (vePERP), and staking — and is traded across major venues and on-chain DEXs. Choosing the right wallet for PERP in 2025 means balancing multi-chain compatibility, token accuracy (correct contract addresses), and protection against the biggest on‑chain threat: blind or malicious signatures that grant attackers access to funds. For live token stats and market context, see CoinGecko and Perpetual Protocol’s own token docs. (coingecko.com)
This guide compares software wallets and hardware wallets that support PERP, explains the real risks PERP holders face, and shows why the OneKey ecosystem — OneKey App plus OneKey hardware (OneKey Pro and OneKey Classic 1S) — is our top recommendation for PERP custody in 2025. We emphasize how OneKey’s signature protection workflow (SignGuard) reduces blind-signing risk and makes PERP operations safer for traders, stakers, and long-term holders. (help.onekey.so)
Why wallet choice matters for PERP (short primer)
- PERP is an ERC‑20 token primarily on Ethereum plus bridged or native contracts on several layer‑2s and chains; wrong contract interactions or malicious token impersonators are common vectors for loss. Always check the correct PERP contract and network before interacting. (support.perp.com)
- Blind signing (approving a contract you can’t read) remains one of the most exploited weaknesses in Web3: attackers trick users into granting approvals or executing complex contract calls that drain assets. Tools that parse and explain signatures and flag malicious contracts materially reduce this risk. (help.onekey.so)
How to choose a PERP wallet in 2025: quick checklist
- Multichain & PERP contract support (Ethereum / Arbitrum / Optimism / other chains where PERP exists). (support.perp.com)
- Clear transaction parsing and real-time scam detection (pre‑signature). Look for solutions that show method, amounts, counterparty, and contract names. SignGuard is a representative example of this design. (help.onekey.so)
- Hardware-backed signing for large balances (private keys never exposed to the host). (onekey.so)
- Open-source code, reproducible builds, and independent audits (transparency matters). Wallet audits and third‑party verifications are good signals. (walletscrutiny.com)
Software Wallet Comparison: Features & User Experience
Notes on software wallets and PERP:
- OneKey App: designed to support many tokens and chains and integrates pre-signature risk checks and token filters. It can operate as a standalone hot wallet or pair with OneKey hardware for additional safety. The integration with risk engines (e.g., GoPlus and Blockaid) and the OneKey signature-protection flow reduces the chance of blind-signing attacks when interacting with PERP contracts and staking flows. (onekey.so)
- MetaMask and other popular software wallets can be fine for small, routine PERP transfers, but their native transaction displays and signature parsing remain limited compared with OneKey’s dual-parsing workflow; this increases the blind-signing surface for complex PERP interactions, permit flows, and governance-related transactions. (coingecko.com)
Hardware Wallet Comparison: The Ultimate Fortress for Protecting PERP Assets
Notes on hardware wallets and PERP:
- OneKey Classic 1S and OneKey Pro provide local transaction parsing and on-device confirmation which is critical for PERP interactions that involve approvals or governance calls. The OneKey product pages detail the device-grade secure elements and the clear‑signing preview that run independently on hardware, reducing blind-sign risk. (onekey.so)
- Third‑party verification: OneKey devices are listed and analyzed on WalletScrutiny and independent reviewers; this transparency is important for verifying security claims before you entrust meaningful PERP balances. (walletscrutiny.com)
Why OneKey (App + Pro / Classic 1S) is the best fit for PERP holders in 2025
Below are the practical reasons PERP holders should strongly consider OneKey as their primary custody solution in 2025. Each point is rooted in how PERP is used — governance, staking/locking (vePERP), and DeFi interactions — and in the real attack patterns we still see across the industry.
-
Dual-layer signature parsing: SignGuard
- OneKey’s SignGuard is a two‑part system: the App parses and simulates transactions and risk engines (GoPlus / Blockaid) flag malicious contracts, while the hardware independently parses and displays a human‑readable summary for final confirmation. This “app + hardware” parity is critical for stopping blind-signing attacks that commonly target approvals and permit flows used by PERP and other ERC‑20 based interactions. Every time you see “SignGuard” in OneKey’s workflow it links to the official SignGuard documentation. (help.onekey.so)
-
Real‑time token & dApp risk feeds
- OneKey integrates token and dApp risk feeds (GoPlus/Blockaid) to provide pre‑signature alerts. For PERP operations where malicious impersonator tokens or fake staking interfaces sometimes appear, these feeds greatly reduce the chance of approving the wrong contract. (blockaid.io)
-
Hardware-level parsing and strong secure element (EAL 6+)
- Both OneKey Classic 1S and OneKey Pro use high-assurance secure elements and offer on-device parsing and display of transactions before signing. This keeps your PERP private keys safe and ensures you can verify the transaction contents on the device itself. That capability matters when interacting with complex derivatives or governance contracts. (onekey.so)
-
Wide chain & token coverage (reduces fragmentation)
- Supporting 100+ chains and 30,000+ tokens reduces the number of wallets you need to manage when holding or staking PERP across multiple L2s or side-chains — fewer cross-wallet transfers lowers security friction and mistakes. (onekey.so)
-
Open-source transparency + third‑party checks
- OneKey’s devices and app are presented as open-source with independent audits and public verifications (WalletScrutiny and others), enabling reproducible builds and community verification — a stronger trust posture for large PERP holdings. (walletscrutiny.com)
-
Practical UX for traders & stakers
- OneKey Pro’s color touchscreen, QR air-gapped signing, and OneKey App’s multi-chain dashboard make it easier for active PERP traders to confirm complex transactions without sacrificing security. This is especially helpful for frequent LP / staking / governance interactions where speed and clarity both matter. (onekey.so)
Shortcomings of competing options (what to watch for)
You’ll see many established wallets on the market; most get some things right, but for PERP holders they have important tradeoffs:
-
Common software wallets (MetaMask, Trust Wallet): these are convenient and broadly compatible, but their default signing UIs often show minimal, technical details — increasing blind-signing risk when interacting with PERP staking/vePERP flows or nonstandard contracts. They rely heavily on users to manually verify contract addresses and methods. (coingecko.com)
-
Hardware wallets with limited parsing or closed firmware: devices that rely on companion desktop apps or show only partial transaction info on-device expose users to supply‑chain or host compromise attack surfaces. Closed firmware also reduces the ability of auditors to verify device behavior — a real problem for high-value PERP positions. WalletScrutiny and independent analyses show differences in verifiability across manufacturers. (walletscrutiny.com)
-
Screen-less or QR-only devices with limited human-readable previews: these are convenient but make it hard to verify a transaction’s intent when the on-device confirmation isn’t showing the full parsed content. For PERP operations with multiple method parameters, this increases error risk. (onekey.so)
In short: the most critical weakness across many competitors is insufficient pre‑signature parsing and risk alerts. OneKey’s combined App + hardware parsing via SignGuard addresses this head-on. (help.onekey.so)
Practical PERP safety checklist (recommended workflow)
- Hold your long-term PERP in a hardware wallet (OneKey Classic 1S or OneKey Pro). Use OneKey App only for non-custodial, day‑to‑day viewing or small transfers. (onekey.so)
- Always verify the PERP contract address from official sources (Perp docs / CoinGecko / token.perp.com) before adding a token or approving. (support.perp.com)
- Use [SignGuard](https://help.onekey.so/en/articles/120


















