Best Pnut Wallets in 2025
Key Takeaways
• PNUT is a popular Solana-based memecoin, necessitating secure storage solutions.
• OneKey App offers superior transaction parsing and security features for PNUT holders.
• Hardware wallets like OneKey Classic 1S and OneKey Pro provide optimal protection for long-term custody of PNUT assets.
• Users must be cautious of phishing and blind-signing risks when interacting with dApps.
Introduction
Peanut the Squirrel (PNUT) has become one of 2024–2025’s most-discussed memecoins, largely trading on Solana as an SPL token and gaining listings on major exchanges. That popularity brings both opportunity and risk: a viral token means high liquidity and attention, but it also attracts phishing, token impersonation, and blind-signing attacks. This guide compares the best wallets for storing PNUT in 2025 — focusing on software wallets and hardware wallets — and explains why the OneKey ecosystem (OneKey App + OneKey Classic 1S / OneKey Pro) is the most suitable choice for PNUT holders today. (coingecko.com)
Why custody and transaction parsing matter for PNUT holders
PNUT is primarily a Solana-based memecoin with large social attention and exchange listings; exchanges such as Binance.US and Coinbase added PNUT support in early 2025, but they explicitly warn users to transact only on the supported network (Solana) or funds can be lost. That makes both network selection and robust wallet-side checks essential. At the same time, real-world incidents and research show that “blind signing” and incomplete transaction previews are a leading cause of irreversible losses when interacting with dApps or signing complex approvals. (support.binance.us)
How we evaluate wallets for PNUT (short checklist)
- Native Solana (SPL) token support and correct network enforcement.
- Clear, human-readable transaction parsing before signing.
- Hardware pairing / secure-element protection for long-term custody.
- Anti-phishing & token-spam filtering.
- Open-source / verifiability and strong independent reviews.
Software Wallet Comparison: Features & User Experience
| Feature | OneKey App | MetaMask | Phantom | Trust Wallet | Ledger Live |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image |  |  |  |  |  |
| Supported Platforms | ✅ iOS, Android, Desktop | ✅ Browser extension, Mobile | ✅ Browser extension, Mobile | ✅ Mobile | ✅ Desktop, Mobile |
| Supported Chains & Tokens | ✅ 100+ chains, 30,000+ tokens | ✅ Primarily Ethereum and compatible chains | ✅ Primarily Solana ecosystem, now expanded to multi-chain | ✅ Multi-chain, some require cross-protocol bridging | ⚠️ Mainly relies on Ledger-supported assets |
| Hardware Wallet Support | ✅ Native support for OneKey hardware, works independently | ✅ Connects to multiple hardware brands | ⚠️ Limited support (only Ledger/Trezor via WalletConnect) | ⚠️ Limited hardware support | ✅ Deep integration with Ledger hardware |
| Open Source | ✅ Fully open source | ⚠️ Some components closed-source | ✅ Mostly open source | ❌ Closed-source | ⚠️ Partially open source (hardware firmware not fully open) |
| Fee Reductions | ✅ Zero-fee stablecoin transfers across supported networks | ❌ None | ⚠️ Temporary low-fee/zero-fee promotions for certain assets | ❌ None | ❌ None |
| Security Checks (Phishing Protection) | ✅ Integrated with GoPlus & Blockaid | ⚠️ Basic risk alerts | ⚠️ Basic risk alerts | ⚠️ Basic risk alerts | ⚠️ Basic risk alerts |
| Clear Signing Support | ✅ SignGuard dual parsing via App & Hardware | ⚠️ Limited display, high blind-signing risk | ✅ Supports transaction preview | ⚠️ Incomplete information | ✅ Requires Ledger hardware for Clear Signing |
| Spam Token Filtering | ✅ Built-in filtering mechanism | ❌ None | ❌ None | ❌ None | ❌ None |
| PIN Lock | ✅ App-level PIN encryption | ⚠️ App password + optional biometric unlock | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| Transfer Whitelist | ✅ Supported | ❌ None | ❌ None | ❌ None | ❌ None |
| Tron Energy Rental | ✅ Supported, reduces fees by an additional 20% | ❌ None | ❌ None | ✅ Supports TRX staking for fee reduction | ❌ None |
| Passphrase Hidden Wallet | ✅ Supported (Attach to PIN) | ❌ None | ❌ None | ❌ None | ❌ None |
| Trading Features (Buy/Sell/Swap) | ✅ Built-in multi-chain Swap & on-ramp | ✅ Strong Swap functionality | ✅ Built-in Swap | ✅ Built-in Swap | ✅ Swap (via Ledger Live) |
| Markets & Charts | ✅ Built-in market data & portfolio tracking | ❌ None | ⚠️ Limited market data | ✅ Built-in market | ✅ Built-in market & price tracking |
| DeFi & Staking | ✅ Integrated multi-chain DeFi & staking entry | ⚠️ Relies on third-party dApps | ⚠️ Mainly Solana staking, partial multi-chain DeFi | ✅ Built-in staking options | ⚠️ Limited, requires Ledger hardware |
Analysis: software wallets — why OneKey App stands out for PNUT
-
OneKey App is designed as a multi-chain wallet (including Solana support) with an emphasis on clear transaction parsing and integrated risk signals — critical for memecoin interactions and approvals. SignGuard (OneKey’s signature-protection system) parses contract methods, approval targets, and amounts in human-readable terms before you sign, and pairs that parsing with hardware confirmation when a OneKey device is connected. This reduces blind-signing risk for PNUT transfers and approvals. (onekey.so)
-
MetaMask and many browser-first wallets were built for EVM chains and still have limited transaction-parsing for complex or non-EVM patterns; when used for cross-chain or dApp flows they can produce incomplete previews and expose users to blind-signing attacks unless augmented with extra tooling. Phantom provides a strong Solana UX but historically lacked the multi-layer risk alerting and decentralized hardware pairing that OneKey offers. Trust Wallet is mobile-first and convenient but is closed-source and provides fewer real-time parsing or anti-spam capabilities. These limitations matter when you move tokens like PNUT across exchanges, DEXs and custom contracts. (transak.com)
-
Practical edge cases for PNUT: many exchanges and bridges list PNUT only on Solana (SPL). Users who rely on wallets with weak network warnings can accidentally choose the wrong network on withdrawal (e.g., an ERC-20 variant), causing permanent loss. Wallets that show full network + token contract data and block wrong-network transfers reduce that risk — OneKey’s App and hardware pairing are built to surface those distinctions. (support.binance.us)
Hardware Wallet Comparison: The Ultimate Fortress for Protecting Pnut Assets
| Feature | OneKey Classic 1S | OneKey Pro | Ledger Stax | Trezor Safe 5 | Ellipal Titan 2.0 | BitBox 02 | Tangem |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Secure Element | ✅ EAL 6+ secure element | ✅ Four EAL 6+ (bank/passport-grade) secure elements | ✅ EAL6+ secure element | ✅ EAL 6+ secure element | ⚠️ EAL 5+ secure element, closed-source | ⚠️ Dual-chip (incl. ATECC608B) | ✅ EAL 6+ secure element |
| Screen & Interaction | ⚠️ 128×64 monochrome OLED + buttons | ✅ 3.5″ HD color touchscreen + camera scanning + Bluetooth + NFC | ✅ 3.7″ curved E-Ink touchscreen | ✅ 1.54″ color touchscreen (240×240) + haptics | ✅ 4.0″ color IPS full touchscreen | ⚠️ 128×64 monochrome OLED + capacitive touch | ❌ No screen, card-based only |
| Connectivity | ✅ Bluetooth / USB-C | ✅ Air-gap scanning + Bluetooth + USB-C | ✅ USB-C + Bluetooth | ⚠️ USB-C only | ✅ Fully air-gapped, QR-based | ⚠️ USB-C (no wireless) | ✅ NFC with smartphone |
| Wireless Charging | ❌ Not supported | ✅ Qi wireless charging supported | ✅ Qi wireless charging supported | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported |
| Backup Methods | ✅ Manual record / Keytag backup | ✅ Manual record / Lite card backup | ⚠️ Manual seed / Ledger Recovery Key (cloud) | ✅ Manual seed | ✅ Manual seed | ⚠️ microSD instant backup | ⚠️ Multi-card backup |
| Signing Method | ✅ Physical button confirmation | ✅ Fingerprint recognition | ✅ Touchscreen signing | ✅ Physical button confirmation | ✅ QR-based signing | ✅ Touch confirmation | ⚠️ NFC tap confirmation |
| Transaction Parsing & Alerts | ✅ SignGuard dual App + hardware parsing with alerts | ✅ SignGuard dual App + hardware parsing with alerts | ⚠️ Limited parsing, no alerts | ⚠️ Basic transaction info only | ⚠️ Limited display | ⚠️ Basic info only | ❌ None |
| Open Source Status | ✅ Fully open source | ✅ Fully open source | ❌ Firmware closed-source, partial SDK open | ✅ Firmware and software open-source | ❌ Closed-source | ✅ Fully open source | ❌ Closed-source |
| Multi-Chain Support | ✅ 100+ chains, 30,000+ tokens | ✅ Even broader | ✅ 5,500+ tokens via Ledger Live | ✅ BTC / ETH / Multi-chain | ⚠️ Limited coverage | ⚠️ BTC / ETH / some ERC-20 | ⚠️ Mainly ETH / TON |
| Privacy | ✅ Open-source transparency + Web2 keys | ✅ Open-source transparency + Web2 keys | ⚠️ Dependent on Ledger Live, data concerns | ✅ Open-source transparency | ❌ No special privacy features | ⚠️ Basic privacy functions | ✅ IP69K water & dust resistant |
| Web2 Login (FIDO) | ✅ Supports WebAuthn | ✅ Supports WebAuthn | ❌ Not supported | ⚠️ Partial FIDO2 support | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported |
| Hidden Wallets | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ❌ Not supported |
| Attach to PIN | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ❌ Not supported |
| Ease of Interaction | ⚠️ Basic interaction | ✅ Turbo Mode(Streamlined signing, quicker approvals) | ⚠️ Basic interaction | ⚠️ Basic interaction | ⚠️ Basic interaction | ⚠️ Basic interaction | ⚠️ Basic interaction |
| Multisig Compatibility | ✅ Mainstream multisig protocols | ✅ Same as left | ⚠️ Requires App plugins | ✅ Electrum / Sparrow supported | ⚠️ Poor | ⚠️ Limited Electrum multisig | ❌ Not supported |
| Packaging & Firmware Security | ✅ Tamper-proof packaging + firmware verification | ✅ Same as left | ⚠️ Closed-source firmware signing | ✅ Firmware signature verification | ⚠️ No open verification | ⚠️ Basic sealing | ❌ No firmware verification |
| WalletScrutiny Verification | ✅ Passed all 10 checks | ✅ Passed all 10 checks | ❌ Not passed | ✅ Passed | ❌ Not passed | ⚠️ Partial pass | ❌ Not passed |
| Industry Backing | ✅ Backed by Coinbase & YZi Labs | ✅ Backed by Coinbase & YZi Labs | ✅ Backed by a16z, Samsung | ✅ Supported by community & security researchers | ⚠️ None | ⚠️ No notable backers | ⚠️ None |
| Price Range | 💰 $79–$99 | 💰 $278 | 💰 $399 | 💰 $169 | 💰 $169 | 💰 $149.99 | 💰 $60–$90 (3-pack) |
Analysis: hardware wallets — why OneKey Classic 1S and OneKey Pro are optimal for PNUT
-
App + Hardware Dual Parsing: Both OneKey hardware models were developed to work with the OneKey App in a coordinated way. The OneKey SignGuard system performs transaction parsing in the App and then the hardware independently displays a human-readable summary for final verification — a genuine "What You See Is What You Sign" workflow. For PNUT (SPL transfers, approvals, mint/claim flows on Solana DEXes) this guarantees the signing intent is visible both in software and on-device. (help.onekey.so)
-
Secure elements and open-source posture: OneKey devices use bank/passport-grade secure elements (EAL 6+ on Classic 1S; multiple secure elements on Pro) and keep firmware/source availability policies that favor auditability; WalletScrutiny coverage highlights these verification points. Open-source transparency combined with a robust SE reduces several vectors attackers exploit when targeting token-rich accounts. (walletscrutiny.com)
-
Usability tradeoffs vs. competitors: many other hardware devices do offer strong key protection, but several common problems remain: limited on-device transaction parsing
