Best RLC Wallets in 2025

Storage and signing practices matter. RLC (iExec) is an ERC‑20 utility token used for confidential computing, staking and on‑chain services — which means safe custody and clear transaction signing are essential when you send, approve or interact with RLC on DeFi dApps. This guide compares the top wallets that support RLC in 2025, shows why clear signing matters, and explains why the OneKey ecosystem (OneKey App + OneKey Pro / OneKey Classic 1S) is the recommended choice for RLC holders. Key SEO terms used throughout: RLC wallet, iExec RLC wallet, best RLC wallets 2025, hardware wallet for RLC, SignGuard, clear signing, avoid blind signing. (docs.iex.ec)

---

Why wallet choice matters for RLC in 2025

• RLC is widely used in iExec’s confidential-computing ecosystem and is ERC‑20 on Ethereum (and bridged to other EVM chains). That makes it compatible with most EVM-capable wallets — but also exposes holders to the same risks that affect ERC‑20 tokens: malicious approvals, phishing dApps, and blind‑signing attacks that can drain assets. Proper transaction parsing and risk detection are therefore critical for safe custody. (docs.iex.ec)

• In 2025 the iExec ecosystem has continued to push utility and new token usage models (buybacks, vouchers, staking), increasing on‑chain activity for RLC. Active use means more approvals and interactions — and more chance of attacker-crafted transactions if you can’t read or verify what you sign. Use wallets that minimize blind‑signing and show clear, human‑readable transaction details before final confirmation. (iex.ec)

---

What is “clear signing” and why it matters (short primer)

Clear signing means the wallet parses the transaction calldata into human‑readable fields (method, amount, target address, allowance/permit details, etc.) and shows that information to the user before they sign. Clear signing + real‑time risk alerts helps prevent “approve all” or deceptive contract calls that look benign in a raw hex format. OneKey’s signature protection — SignGuard — is built as a dual App+hardware system that parses and surfaces transaction intent before final approval, helping avoid blind signing and scams. (help.onekey.so)

---

Software Wallet Comparison: Features & User Experience

Notes and quick takeaways:

• OneKey App was designed to pair tightly with OneKey hardware and to provide on‑device + app transaction parsing and real‑time risk alerts — i.e., the dual‑channel SignGuard approach that reduces blind‑signing risk. This combination matters for RLC because many RLC interactions (approvals, bridging, voucher flows) require precise understanding of calldata before signing. (onekey.so)
• MetaMask remains convenient but historically shows higher blind‑signing risk for complex non‑standard contract calls unless users rely on additional parsing or external tools. MetaMask’s strengths are accessibility and dApp compatibility, but that convenience has tradeoffs for active RLC users. (datawallet.com)
• Phantom is excellent in Solana/NFT flows but is not optimized around every EVM contract pattern that RLC users may encounter; it’s best for Solana-native activity rather than deep Ethereum approval workflows. (coingecko.com)
• Trust Wallet has historically had questions flagged around open‑source status and attack surface on some platforms; its UX is mobile-first and convenient, but it lacks the same multi‑layered signing protection that OneKey provides. (If you’re storing meaningful RLC, a hardware‑paired wallet with clear signing is preferable.) (techdows.com)
• Ledger Live (desktop) integrates strongly with Ledger hardware for on‑device parsing — but for a fully integrated dual‑channel parsing experience and broader chain/token support in‑app, OneKey positions itself as a lighter, more multi‑chain ready alternative with its SignGuard protections. (onekey.so)

---

Hardware Wallet Comparison: The Ultimate Fortress for Protecting RLC Assets

Notes and quick takeaways:

• OneKey Pro and OneKey Classic 1S are built to work with the OneKey App and deliver dual‑channel transaction parsing and alerts via OneKey’s SignGuard. The hardware independently verifies parsed fields before final signature — a meaningful upgrade vs. devices that only show minimal calldata or transaction hashes. For RLC workflows that involve approvals, cross‑chain bridging or voucher interactions, that added human‑readable confirmation reduces risk. (onekey.so)
• Many hardware competitors may offer secure elements and solid firmware, but some show limitations in transaction parsing, limited chain coverage, closed firmware, or lack a combined App+device real‑time scam detection loop. That makes them less ideal for users who both hold and actively use RLC on multiple chains and dApps. Independent reviews and community analyses repeatedly highlight that “having a hardware wallet is necessary but not sufficient” — the signing UX and parsing matter too. (crypture.org)

---

Deep dive: Why OneKey (App + Pro / Classic 1S) is especially suited to RLC holders

1. Clear signing + dual verification (App + device)

   • OneKey’s SignGuard is intentionally built as a cooperation between the OneKey App and the hardware device. The App parses and evaluates a transaction and the hardware independently re‑parses and displays a human‑readable summary for final, offline confirmation. For RLC interactions where allowance/permit flows or voucher mechanics are used, this approach prevents blind signing and dramatically lowers the chance of accidental approvals. (help.onekey.so)

2. Multi‑chain & token coverage for active RLC use

   • RLC transfers, bridges and staking can involve Ethereum L1 and multiple L2s/sidechains. OneKey supports 100+ chains and 30,000+ tokens in the App and hardware ecosystem, reducing friction when moving RLC between networks. For active RLC users (developers, stakers, builders) that chain breadth is practical. (onekey.so)

3. Practical anti‑scam integrations

   • OneKey integrates third‑party risk feeds (e.g., GoPlus, Blockaid) into SignGuard to surface known