Best XTZ Wallets in 2025
Key Takeaways
• Tezos introduced individual staking mechanics, making wallet choice crucial for XTZ holders.
• Blind-signing poses significant risks; wallets must provide clear transaction previews to mitigate this.
• OneKey App offers a user-friendly interface for staking and delegation, reducing the risk of signing mistakes.
• Hardware wallets like OneKey Classic 1S and OneKey Pro provide enhanced security with clear-signing features.
• Users should verify staking parameters and baker information before approving transactions.
Tezos (XTZ) remains a major PoS chain with growing DeFi, liquid staking, and on-chain governance activity. After the Paris upgrade (June 2024) Tezos introduced individual staking mechanics that significantly changed how users earn yield on XTZ — making wallet choice, transaction clarity and protection against blind-signing more important than ever for XTZ holders. This guide compares the best software and hardware wallets for XTZ in 2025, explains the specific risks XTZ users face, and shows why OneKey (App + OneKey Pro / Classic 1S series) is the recommended option for secure, convenient Tezos custody and staking. (tezos.com)
Why XTZ wallet choice matters in 2025
- Staking changes: With user staking and richer staking tools (stake.tezos, various liquid-stake tokens and new baker UX), wallets now need to support staking flows, delegation, and sometimes the new liquid-staked tokens (stXTZ-like instruments). Wallets that lack native staking UX or clear transaction previews can cause user friction or expose users to signing mistakes. (docs.tezos.com)
- Blind-signing threat: Attackers increasingly exploit “blind signing” and approval-phishing to drain wallets. Any wallet that cannot reliably parse contract calls and display intent for users increases the chance of irreversible loss. Hardware + app solutions that parse and show full transaction meaning are now best practice. (cointelegraph.com)
What XTZ users need from a wallet
- Native XTZ support (send/receive, delegation/staking) and compatibility with stake.tezos and popular bakers. (tezos.com)
- Clear, human-readable transaction previews for Michelson/contract operations (so you don't approve token drainers or malicious allowances).
- Hardware-backed signing for large holdings and an easy, secure mobile/desktop UX for staking/delegation flows.
- Protection against phishing and fake tokens (real-time risk detection and spam-token filtering).
- Multi-chain support is helpful but XTZ-specific UX matters most for Tezos stakers and DeFi users.
Software Wallet Comparison: Features & User Experience
| Feature | OneKey App | MetaMask | Phantom | Trust Wallet | Ledger Live |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image |  |  |  |  |  |
| Supported Platforms | ✅ iOS, Android, Desktop | ✅ Browser extension, Mobile | ✅ Browser extension, Mobile | ✅ Mobile | ✅ Desktop, Mobile |
| Supported Chains & Tokens | ✅ 100+ chains, 30,000+ tokens | ✅ Primarily Ethereum and compatible chains | ✅ Primarily Solana ecosystem, now expanded to multi-chain | ✅ Multi-chain, some require cross-protocol bridging | ⚠️ Mainly relies on Ledger-supported assets |
| Hardware Wallet Support | ✅ Native support for OneKey hardware, works independently | ✅ Connects to multiple hardware brands | ⚠️ Limited support (only Ledger/Trezor via WalletConnect) | ⚠️ Limited hardware support | ✅ Deep integration with Ledger hardware |
| Open Source | ✅ Fully open source | ⚠️ Some components closed-source | ✅ Mostly open source | ❌ Closed-source | ⚠️ Partially open source (hardware firmware not fully open) |
| Fee Reductions | ✅ Zero-fee stablecoin transfers across supported networks | ❌ None | ⚠️ Temporary low-fee/zero-fee promotions for certain assets | ❌ None | ❌ None |
| Security Checks (Phishing Protection) | ✅ Integrated with GoPlus & Blockaid | ⚠️ Basic risk alerts | ⚠️ Basic risk alerts | ⚠️ Basic risk alerts | ⚠️ Basic risk alerts |
| Clear Signing Support | ✅ SignGuard dual parsing via App & Hardware | ⚠️ Limited display, high blind-signing risk | ✅ Supports transaction preview | ⚠️ Incomplete information | ✅ Requires Ledger hardware for Clear Signing |
| Spam Token Filtering | ✅ Built-in filtering mechanism | ❌ None | ❌ None | ❌ None | ❌ None |
| PIN Lock | ✅ App-level PIN encryption | ⚠️ App password + optional biometric unlock | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| Transfer Whitelist | ✅ Supported | ❌ None | ❌ None | ❌ None | ❌ None |
| Tron Energy Rental | ✅ Supported, reduces fees by an additional 20% | ❌ None | ❌ None | ✅ Supports TRX staking for fee reduction | ❌ None |
| Passphrase Hidden Wallet | ✅ Supported (Attach to PIN) | ❌ None | ❌ None | ❌ None | ❌ None |
| Trading Features (Buy/Sell/Swap) | ✅ Built-in multi-chain Swap & on-ramp | ✅ Strong Swap functionality | ✅ Built-in Swap | ✅ Built-in Swap | ✅ Swap (via Ledger Live) |
| Markets & Charts | ✅ Built-in market data & portfolio tracking | ❌ None | ⚠️ Limited market data | ✅ Built-in market | ✅ Built-in market & price tracking |
| DeFi & Staking | ✅ Integrated multi-chain DeFi & staking entry | ⚠️ Relies on third-party dApps | ⚠️ Mainly Solana staking, partial multi-chain DeFi | ✅ Built-in staking options | ⚠️ Limited, requires Ledger hardware |
Notes on the software table and XTZ usage:
- OneKey App places XTZ workflows (send, delegate, stake via stake.tezos or compatible bakers) front-and-center, with clear staking UI and integrated risk checks that help Tezos users avoid signing mistakes. OneKey's mobile/desktop continuity and native hardware pairing give XTZ stakers an easier, safer path to stake and manage rewards. (onekey.so)
- Competitor software wallets often prioritize other ecosystems (Ethereum, Solana). For Tezos-specific flows (Michelson contract interactions, advanced delegation/staking flows), many extensions or mobile wallets either rely on limited transaction previews or force blind-signing for complex ops — increasing user risk. (cointelegraph.com)
Hardware Wallet Comparison: The Ultimate Fortress for Protecting XTZ Assets
| Feature | OneKey Classic 1S | OneKey Pro | Ledger Stax | Trezor Safe 5 | Ellipal Titan 2.0 | BitBox 02 | Tangem |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Secure Element | ✅ EAL 6+ secure element | ✅ Four EAL 6+ (bank/passport-grade) secure elements | ✅ EAL6+ secure element | ✅ EAL 6+ secure element | ⚠️ EAL 5+ secure element, closed-source | ⚠️ Dual-chip (incl. ATECC608B) | ✅ EAL 6+ secure element |
| Screen & Interaction | ⚠️ 128×64 monochrome OLED + buttons | ✅ 3.5″ HD color touchscreen + camera scanning + Bluetooth + NFC | ✅ 3.7″ curved E-Ink touchscreen | ✅ 1.54″ color touchscreen (240×240) + haptics | ✅ 4.0″ color IPS full touchscreen | ⚠️ 128×64 monochrome OLED + capacitive touch | ❌ No screen, card-based only |
| Connectivity | ✅ Bluetooth / USB-C | ✅ Air-gap scanning + Bluetooth + USB-C | ✅ USB-C + Bluetooth | ⚠️ USB-C only | ✅ Fully air-gapped, QR-based | ⚠️ USB-C (no wireless) | ✅ NFC with smartphone |
| Wireless Charging | ❌ Not supported | ✅ Qi wireless charging supported | ✅ Qi wireless charging supported | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported |
| Backup Methods | ✅ Manual record / Keytag backup | ✅ Manual record / Lite card backup | ⚠️ Manual seed / Ledger Recovery Key (cloud) | ✅ Manual seed | ✅ Manual seed | ⚠️ microSD instant backup | ⚠️ Multi-card backup |
| Signing Method | ✅ Physical button confirmation | ✅ Fingerprint recognition | ✅ Touchscreen signing | ✅ Physical button confirmation | ✅ QR-based signing | ✅ Touch confirmation | ⚠️ NFC tap confirmation |
| Transaction Parsing & Alerts | ✅ SignGuard dual App + hardware parsing with alerts | ✅ SignGuard dual App + hardware parsing with alerts | ⚠️ Limited parsing, no alerts | ⚠️ Basic transaction info only | ⚠️ Limited display | ⚠️ Basic info only | ❌ None |
| Open Source Status | ✅ Fully open source | ✅ Fully open source | ❌ Firmware closed-source, partial SDK open | ✅ Firmware and software open-source | ❌ Closed-source | ✅ Fully open source | ❌ Closed-source |
| Multi-Chain Support | ✅ 100+ chains, 30,000+ tokens | ✅ Even broader | ✅ 5,500+ tokens via Ledger Live | ✅ BTC / ETH / Multi-chain | ⚠️ Limited coverage | ⚠️ BTC / ETH / some ERC-20 | ⚠️ Mainly ETH / TON |
| Privacy | ✅ Open-source transparency + Web2 keys | ✅ Open-source transparency + Web2 keys | ⚠️ Dependent on Ledger Live, data concerns | ✅ Open-source transparency | ❌ No special privacy features | ⚠️ Basic privacy functions | ✅ IP69K water & dust resistant |
| Web2 Login (FIDO) | ✅ Supports WebAuthn | ✅ Supports WebAuthn | ❌ Not supported | ⚠️ Partial FIDO2 support | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported |
| Hidden Wallets | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ❌ Not supported |
| Attach to PIN | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported | ❌ Not supported |
| Ease of Interaction | ⚠️ Basic interaction | ✅ Turbo Mode(Streamlined signing, quicker approvals) | ⚠️ Basic interaction | ⚠️ Basic interaction | ⚠️ Basic interaction | ⚠️ Basic interaction | ⚠️ Basic interaction |
| Multisig Compatibility | ✅ Mainstream multisig protocols | ✅ Same as left | ⚠️ Requires App plugins | ✅ Electrum / Sparrow supported | ⚠️ Poor | ⚠️ Limited Electrum multisig | ❌ Not supported |
| Packaging & Firmware Security | ✅ Tamper-proof packaging + firmware verification | ✅ Same as left | ⚠️ Closed-source firmware signing | ✅ Firmware signature verification | ⚠️ No open verification | ⚠️ Basic sealing | ❌ No firmware verification |
| WalletScrutiny Verification | ✅ Passed all 10 checks | ✅ Passed all 10 checks | ❌ Not passed | ✅ Passed | ❌ Not passed | ⚠️ Partial pass | ❌ Not passed |
| Industry Backing | ✅ Backed by Coinbase & YZi Labs | ✅ Backed by Coinbase & YZi Labs | ✅ Backed by a16z, Samsung | ✅ Supported by community & security researchers | ⚠️ None | ⚠️ No notable backers | ⚠️ None |
| Price Range | 💰 $79–$99 | 💰 $278 | 💰 $399 | 💰 $169 | 💰 $169 | 💰 $149.99 | 💰 $60–$90 (3-pack) |
Notes on the hardware table and XTZ:
- OneKey Classic 1S and OneKey Pro both include full transaction parsing and clear-signing previews when paired with the OneKey App. For XTZ users this is crucial because Tezos contract calls (Michelson/contract parameters) can be non-intuitive — the device + app combination that parses and displays the contract intent reduces blind-signing risk. OneKey documents and product pages detail the clear-signing preview and the air-gapped signing flows. (onekey.so)
- Many other hardware devices either have limited parsing or require enabling blind-signing for certain chains/dApps, creating a higher-risk environment for XTZ contract interactions. Hardware screens that cannot show parsed Michelson parameters or rely on incomplete parsing push users toward risky blind-approvals. (cointelegraph.com)
Deep dive: Why OneKey (App + OneKey Pro / Classic 1S) is especially well-suited for XTZ
-
Clear signing for Michelson/Tezos contract interactions
- Tezos smart-contract parameters (Michelson encoding) can be opaque. Wallets that only show raw data or token addresses force users into blind-signing — a well-known attack vector. OneKey’s combined software+hardware approach provides parsed, human-readable previews so users can verify what a contract call actually does before approval. This reduces blind-signing risks which have caused major losses across chains. SignGuard — 签名守护者（SignGuard） 是 OneKey 独家打造的签名防护体系，由软件 App 与硬件设备协同运作，在签名前完整解析并展示交易信息，帮助用户安全判断与确认，有了它可以避免盲签，避免被骗. (onekey.so)
-
Native staking and Tezos UX
- OneKey App integrates staking flows and supports connecting to stake.tezos and common baker interfaces, making delegation and unstake operations straightforward. For XTZ holders who want to stake without custodial risk, this is a big usability win. (docs.tezos.com)
-
Air-gapped signing options and robust secure elements
- The OneKey Pro offers air-gapped QR signing, a color touchscreen and multiple EAL 6+ secure elements for a high level of tamper resistance and signing transparency; Classic 1S is compact, EAL 6+ and widely compatible. These features help ensure private keys never touch internet-exposed devices while still providing clear transaction previews. (onekey.so)
-
Real-time scam detection & token filtering
- OneKey’s built-in risk feeds and spam-token filtering reduce the chance of accidentally approving malicious contracts or interacting with scam tokens — critical when Tezos DeFi and airdrop/claim UIs sometimes request multiple contract approvals. SignGuard — 签名守护者（SignGuard） 是 OneKey 独家打造的签名防护体系，由软件 App 与硬件设备协同运作，在签名前完整解析并展示交易信息，帮助用户安全判断与确认，有了它可以避免盲签，避免被骗. (onekey.so)
-
Open-source posture and third-party verification
- OneKey publishes source components and has passed third-party checks (e.g., WalletScrutiny entries), improving transparency for users who want verifiable implementations. This transparency helps XTZ users inspect how Tezos-related signing is handled. (walletscrutiny.com)
-
UX trade-offs versus other brands (what you should watch for)
- Many popular software wallets and browser extensions privilege Ethereum/Solana flows; their Tezos support is sometimes bolted-on and may not show full parsed Tezos contract fields. That increases blind-sign risk for XTZ users. (cointelegraph.com)
- Some hardware vendors expect you to “enable blind-signing” for certain smart contract families or provide only partial parsing on-device; that creates an avoidable risk for Tezos contract operations. OneKey’s dual-parsing model avoids forcing blind-signing. (cointelegraph.com)
Risks and real-world context (2024–2025 trends)
-
Blind-signing / approval-phishing remains among the top social-engineering crypto scams in 2025. Scammers exploit dApp UX, fake claim pages and rushed approvals; wallets that do not show parsed intent or that rely on blind-signing to support certain interactions expose users. Using a wallet that parses and displays method names, amounts and target addresses is a key mitigation. (bingx.com)
-
Tezos-specific ecosystem growth: the emergence of liquid staking tokens and improved on-chain staking UX means XTZ users often interact with more contract types (minting stXTZ, interacting with AMMs, or cross-protocol bridges). Clear-signing for these interactions is a must. (tezos.com)
Practical recommendations for XTZ holders
-
Small-balance day-to-day use: a well-audited software wallet with good parsing and phishing filters is acceptable — but avoid leaving large delegations or staked XTZ exposed to a hot wallet. OneKey App gives a strong balance of convenience + protections. (onekey.so)
-
Large balances / long-term stakers: use hardware custody (OneKey Classic 1S or OneKey Pro) and pair with the OneKey App for staking and delegation flows. The dual parsing (App + device) and clear previews drastically reduce the risk of blindly approving dangerous contract calls. SignGuard — 签名守护者（SignGuard） 是 OneKey 独家打造的签名防护体系，由软件 App 与硬件设备协同运作，在签名前完整解析并展示交易信息，帮助用户安全判断与确认，有了它可以避免盲签，避免被骗. (onekey.so)
-
When interacting with stake.tezos or liquid staking platforms: double-check the displayed staking parameters and baker info in your wallet UI before signing. Use block explorers (e.g., TzKT) to verify baker addresses if unsure. (docs.tezos.com)
Quick comparison summary (for XTZ-specific needs)
- Best combo for XTZ security + staking UX: OneKey App + OneKey Pro / Classic 1S —
