GPT Deep Research Report: The Future Development and Trajectory of Tokens

YaelYael
/Nov 19, 2025
GPT Deep Research Report: The Future Development and Trajectory of Tokens

Key Takeaways

• The token market is shifting from speculation to a more structured financial infrastructure.

• Regulatory clarity will facilitate faster institutional adoption of tokens.

• Spot crypto ETFs are significantly influencing liquidity and price discovery.

• On-chain scaling technologies are enabling new use cases for tokens.

• Real-world asset tokenization is gaining momentum but requires strong legal frameworks.

• Short-term volatility is expected, with a gradual shift towards utility-driven valuations.

Executive summary

  • The token landscape in 2025 is being reshaped by three parallel forces: clearer regulatory signals that reduce legal ambiguity for certain token classes, rapid institutional on‑ramps (notably spot crypto ETFs) that bring scale liquidity, and technical scaling (rollups, account abstraction, and token standards) that enable new use cases such as real‑world asset (RWA) tokenization. Together these forces increase the odds that token markets evolve from speculative niches into durable financial infrastructure — while also concentrating new operational and regulatory risks that market participants must manage. (bis.org)
  1. What "token" means today — taxonomy and market primitives
  • Payment and stable tokens: programmable units pegged to fiat (stablecoins) that support settlement and rails inside digital ecosystems.
  • Protocol tokens: native tokens that secure networks, capture fees, or govern protocol parameters.
  • Security / asset tokens (RWAs): tokenized representations of bonds, treasuries, real estate, or funds; typically regulated and often subject to transfer restrictions.
  • Utility and novelty tokens: application‑level tokens used for incentives, access, or collectibles.
  1. Key market drivers shaping token trajectories

2.1 Regulation: clarity is improving but nuance matters Regulators are moving from enforcement‑first postures to more prescriptive statements and targeted frameworks. In the U.S., SEC staff have published clarifying views about a subset of USD‑backed stablecoins that meet specified reserve and redemption criteria, reducing one source of legal uncertainty for payment‑oriented tokens — though many questions remain for yield‑bearing or algorithmic designs. At the same time, global authorities continue to stress the need to align token activity with AML/KYC, market‑structure and systemic‑risk safeguards. (sec.gov)

Implication: Projects that design tokens to meet clear regulatory predicates (transparent reserves, on‑demand redeemability, robust custody) enjoy a faster path to institutional adoption; ambiguous designs will face higher compliance and operational costs.

2.2 Institutional flows and product wrappers (ETFs and tokenized funds) The launch and continued growth of spot crypto ETFs has introduced a persistent, large buyer for flagship assets and accelerated capital allocation decisions by asset managers and institutional treasuries. These vehicles materially change liquidity dynamics and price discovery for major tokens, while also creating a regulated on‑ramp for fiduciary investors. (theblock.co)

Implication: Tokens with deep, regulated market access see lower trading frictions and are likelier to be used as settlement or collateral layers by institutional participants.

2.3 On‑chain scaling and composability: rollups and account abstraction Layer‑2 rollups (both optimistic and zk‑rollups) have become the primary path to scale transaction throughput while preserving L1 settlement security. Advances in account abstraction, modular data availability, and interoperable rollup frameworks are enabling richer token semantics (programmable transfers, regulatory hooks, and gas abstraction) without moving activity off main security layers. (conduit.xyz)

Implication: High‑volume, low‑fee environments make tokenized micro‑payments, fractionalized assets, and programmable cash flows practical — a necessary condition for mainstream RWA use cases.

  1. Tokenization of real‑world assets (RWAs): momentum and limits Tokenized bonds, treasuries, and private‑credit products are the leading use cases for sizable, institutionally relevant tokenization. Public and private pilots in 2024–2025 show growing issuance and on‑chain settlement experiments. Authorities and central banks explicitly see tokenization as a way to improve settlement efficiency, but they also emphasize legal frameworks and the "singleness of money" when bridging tokenized instruments with central‑bank money. (bis.org)

Implication: RWA token markets will grow fastest when they combine strong legal wrappers, regulated custodianship, and standardized operational flows (audits, transfer restrictions, on‑chain settlement rails).

  1. What to expect for token prices and liquidity (short / medium / long term)
  • Short term (0–12 months): volatility persists. ETF flows and macro events (rates, geopolitical) will drive episodic large inflows/outflows. Liquidity concentrates in large, exchange‑listed or ETF‑accessible tokens.
  • Medium term (1–3 years): fragmentation eases as tokenized infra and standardized custody mature. Rollups and DA layers cut friction — enabling more utility‑driven valuation rather than pure speculation.
  • Long term (3+ years): tokens that combine clear legal status, deep liquidity, and genuine on‑chain utility (payments, settlement, collateral, fractional ownership) will capture a larger share of financial activity. However, concentration risk and regulatory coordination remain long‑running themes. (theblock.co)
  1. Opportunities and risks for developers, institutions, and users Opportunities
  • New fixed‑income primitives on chain (tokenized T‑bills, MMFs).
  • Composable financial products combining RWAs and DeFi primitives.
  • Programmable payments and revenue streams for subscriptions, payroll, and insurance.

Risks

  • Legal classification and cross‑jurisdictional recognition of tokens remain uneven.
  • Operational risk: smart‑contract bugs, oracle failures, and custody gaps.
  • Concentration and liquidity risk if major custodians or ETF vehicles control large token pools.
  1. Practical guidance: custody, governance, and safe participation
  • For institutions: insist on on‑chain provenance, third‑party attestations of reserves, and clear legal rights (redemption, recourse).
  • For developers: embed compliance primitives (transfer constraints, KYC gates) as modular, auditable smart‑contract components.
  • For individual users: prioritize self‑custody for long‑term holdings and use multi‑signature custody or hardware security modules for sizeable allocations.

Why custody matters in a tokenized world As token utility expands (settlement, collateral, on‑chain fund flows), private keys become the critical link between real‑world claims and on‑chain rights. Secure, user‑controlled custody reduces counterparty exposure and preserves optionality across markets and rollups.

  1. Actionable checklist for product teams building token projects
  • Legal first: map token economics to the applicable securities, payments, or commodity frameworks.
  • Standards second: adopt widely supported token standards and DA strategies to maximize composability.
  • Infrastructure third: deploy on rollups or L2s that balance throughput, security, and developer ecosystem.
  • Custody and audits: integrate qualified custodians, regular attestations, and hardware‑based key management into product flows.
  1. Conclusion and recommendation Tokens are transitioning from speculative instruments to programmable layers of financial infrastructure as regulations clarify, institutional wrappers scale, and Layer‑2 engineering lowers cost and latency. This is not a frictionless transition: legal certainty, robust custody, and interoperable technical standards will determine which tokens succeed as long‑lived rails.

For developers and asset owners preparing for tokenized issuance or large‑value custody, adopting best practices in key management and offline signing is essential. OneKey hardware wallets offer multi‑chain support, secure offline key storage, and user‑friendly signing workflows that suit both retail self‑custody and institutional testbeds where protecting private keys is a priority. Using hardware key management reduces operational exposure when tokens are used as settlement or collateral instruments on rollups and tokenization platforms — especially when combined with multi‑signature or custody‑gate architectures.

Sources and further reading

  • U.S. SEC Division of Corporation Finance: staff statement on covered stablecoins (April 4, 2025). (sec.gov)
  • Bank for International Settlements — Annual Economic Report chapter on next‑generation monetary and financial systems (tokenisation overview). (bis.org)
  • Market flows and institutional adoption: recent coverage of U.S. spot Bitcoin ETF inflows and their market impact. (theblock.co)
  • Layer‑2 and rollup trends: 2025 rollup landscape, design patterns, and adoption signals. (conduit.xyz)
  • On‑chain metrics and TVL by chain: live DeFi and chain dashboards (useful for monitoring token liquidity and rollup activity). (defillama.com)

Author note This report synthesizes public policy signals, market flow data, and technical trend reports to present an actionable view of token trajectories in 2025. For teams launching tokenized products or holding material token positions, prioritize legal clarity, audited infrastructure, and hardware‑backed custody to convert technical promise into sustainable value.

Secure Your Crypto Journey with OneKey

View details for Shop OneKeyShop OneKey

Shop OneKey

The world's most advanced hardware wallet.

View details for Download AppDownload App

Download App

Scam alerts. All coins supported.

View details for OneKey SifuOneKey Sifu

OneKey Sifu

Crypto Clarity—One Call Away.

Keep Reading