What’s Next for Polkadot: Upcoming Upgrades and Milestones for 2025–26

Polkadot enters 2025 after a pivotal year of shipping Polkadot 2.0 concepts to production. The network shifted from slot auctions to a market for blockspace (coretime), accelerated block production with Asynchronous Backing, improved cross-chain messaging, and rolled out permissionless bridging to Ethereum. Looking ahead to 2025–26, the roadmap focuses on scaling throughput, lowering developer overhead, hardening security, and evolving the protocol toward the long-term JAM vision.

This article summarizes what users, builders, and validators can expect over the next 18 months—and how to prepare.

Recap: What Polkadot 2.0 Changed

Polkadot 2.0 reframed the network around a flexible market for compute and data availability. Instead of long-lived slot leases, teams can buy time on the relay chain (coretime), in smaller or larger chunks, and schedule it more efficiently. This shift is designed to onboard many more app-chains and workloads while keeping costs predictable.

• Agile Coretime and the coretime market enable pay‑as‑you‑go blockspace and bulk reservations, replacing auctions and lowering capital costs for new chains. See the overview in Introducing Polkadot 2.0 for context and design goals (reference: Polkadot 2.0 explainer; Coretime fundamentals).
• Asynchronous Backing improves block production efficiency and inclusion times, boosting throughput without compromising security (Asynchronous Backing).
• Cross-chain messaging (XCM) upgrades unlocked richer, safer asset and instruction routing across parachains and system chains (XCM documentation).

With those foundations in place, 2025–26 is about scaling them out, simplifying developer experience, and opening new economic and governance primitives.

1) Scaling Blockspace: Coretime Evolution and Scheduling

Expect the coretime market to grow more liquid and efficient:

• Secondary markets and deeper tooling: More sophisticated brokers, research, and dashboards will help teams buy, sell, and schedule coretime with better price discovery. Design discussions and updates typically surface in community governance threads and the technical forum (reference: Polkadot Forum; OpenGov).
• Bulk and elastic options: Builders will increasingly combine bulk reservations for steady workloads with elastic/on-demand bursts for spiky traffic, reducing total cost while keeping latency low (Coretime overview).
• Runtime optimizations: Further improvements to the relay chain scheduler and collation pipeline aim to shrink inclusion times and enhance liveness under load (Asynchronous Backing).

For teams that previously hesitated to launch a parachain, these changes make app‑specific execution more accessible. For app developers preferring smart contracts, EVM and ink! chains benefit indirectly through greater overall throughput and cheaper, more reliable XCM routing.

2) Cross‑Chain Connectivity: Bridges and XCM in Practice

Polkadot’s vision hinges on secure interoperability. In 2024, the permissionless Ethereum bridge Snowbridge reached production, paving the way for native ETH–DOT flows without trusted custodians. Over 2025–26, expect:

• Wider adoption of Snowbridge for token transfers and cross‑chain calls between Polkadot and Ethereum, as tooling matures and fees stabilize (reference: Snowbridge docs; news coverage: Snowbridge goes live).
• More use of system chains like Asset Hub and Bridge Hub to standardize cross‑ecosystem assets and routes, improving UX for wallets and dapps (Asset Hub; Bridge Hub).
• Continued refinements to XCM for safer asset movements, better fee handling, and improved error recovery in complex routes (XCM documentation).

For DeFi, gaming, and payments, the combination of Snowbridge and XCM expands design space for multi‑chain liquidity and programmable asset flows.

3) Governance and Funding: OpenGov at Scale

OpenGov makes treasury, upgrades, and parameter changes fully on‑chain and track‑based, enabling concurrent and specialized decision‑making. Over the next 18 months:

• Expect more automation in recurring funding, clearer track definitions, and dashboards for proposal lifecycle tracking—lowering friction for public goods and protocol maintenance (OpenGov; Treasury).
• Ecosystem maintenance via bounties and collectives will expand, moving more parts of the roadmap to permissionless contributors under on‑chain oversight (Collectives and system chains).

This governance stack is critical for shipping at network scale while keeping the upgrade path credible and decentralized.

4) Developer Experience: Polkadot SDK, Runtime, and Tools

The Polkadot SDK will remain a focal point in 2025–26, with upgrades targeting safety, ergonomics, and performance:

• FRAME and pallet improvements to reduce boilerplate, sharpen testing, and integrate best practices for cross‑chain calls and fee markets.
• Better local and cloud development loops, including faster runtime iteration and profiling for collators.
• Ongoing security hardening and auditability across the SDK and tooling (reference: Polkadot SDK on GitHub).

These changes aim to lower time‑to‑mainnet for new chains and make long‑term maintenance cheaper.

5) Staking, Security, and Validator Economics

Staking has evolved with nomination pools and improved queues, bringing more participants into active security. In 2025–26, look for:

• Refinements to nomination pool mechanics and UX, helping small DOT holders participate efficiently.
• Incremental improvements to slashing transparency, alerts, and validator metrics to align operator incentives with network performance (Staking overview; Nomination pools).

As throughput rises, validators will also benefit from stabilized reward models and clearer guidelines on hardware/network requirements.

6) The Path to JAM: Research to Prototype

The long‑term roadmap points to JAM (Join‑Accumulate Machine), a minimal, verifiable compute fabric designed to generalize Polkadot’s architecture. Proposed by Gavin Wood in the JAM Graypaper, the vision aims to simplify the relay layer and make execution more modular and efficient.

• 2025 focus: prototype milestones, testnets, and specifications coordinated by the Fellowship and core protocol contributors (JAM Graypaper; Polkadot Fellowship).
• 2026 outlook: community validation of migration paths and compatibility with existing parachains and XCM patterns, with OpenGov guiding any mainnet adoption steps.

While timelines are subject to research outcomes and governance approval, JAM’s direction is clear: a leaner core with stronger guarantees and a broader set of execution choices.

What Builders Should Do Now

• Model your blockspace needs: Use the coretime market to blend steady reservations with elastic bursts, aiming for predictable costs and consistent latency (Coretime fundamentals).
• Design for cross‑chain: Treat XCM as a first‑class primitive. Consider Snowbridge for Ethereum interoperability and Asset Hub standards for fungible assets (XCM; Snowbridge docs).
• Lean on OpenGov and the treasury: Seek bounties or proposals to co‑fund infrastructure, audits, and public goods while building in the open (OpenGov; Treasury).
• Keep an eye on SDK releases: Align your pallets and runtime with the latest SDK improvements for performance and security (Polkadot SDK).

What Users Can Expect

• Faster, cheaper, and more reliable cross‑chain experiences as XCM routes, fees, and bridges mature.
• More app‑specific chains launching without long auctions, thanks to accessible coretime.
• A growing set of governance and treasury initiatives funding tooling, education, and UX upgrades.

Risks and Unknowns

• Research timelines: JAM is ambitious and may evolve through multiple prototypes before any mainnet transition. Governance will gate progress.
• Market dynamics: Coretime prices will respond to demand; teams should hedge via mixed reservation strategies.
• Bridge UX: While Snowbridge is designed to be trust‑minimized, user safety hinges on wallet hygiene, correct routes, and cautious approvals.

Security Best Practices: Hardware Wallets for Polkadot Users

Participating in staking, OpenGov, and cross‑chain transfers makes key management critical. A hardware wallet reduces risk for day‑to‑day voting, XCM calls, and parachain interactions. OneKey is open‑source, supports major Substrate networks including Polkadot, and integrates with popular ecosystem wallets for transaction review and signing. If you expect to handle governance voting, treasury payouts, or high‑value Snowbridge transfers, using a OneKey device for cold‑key protection and clear‑text transaction previews can materially reduce operational risk.

—

Polkadot’s 2025–26 arc is about turning the 2.0 blueprint into a high‑throughput, developer‑friendly, and securely interconnected network—while laying the groundwork for the JAM era. If you build, the best time to align with coretime, XCM, and SDK upgrades is now. If you invest or participate, follow OpenGov, stake responsibly, and secure your keys as Polkadot scales into its next chapter.