Best ANKR Wallets in 2025

Introduction

ANKR (Ankr Network) has become an important piece of the Web3 infrastructure stack — powering RPC endpoints, liquid staking products and a growing token ecosystem. With expanded staking, liquid-staked derivatives (e.g., ankrETH), and DeFi integrations, holding ANKR safely while interacting with dApps and staking services is more important than ever. Choosing the right wallet for ANKR in 2025 means balancing broad token support, staking compatibility, and — crucially — transaction transparency to avoid blind-signing scams and malicious approvals. For ANKR users, the strongest option today combines a modern, multi‑chain software wallet with hardware-backed signing that parses and explains transactions before you confirm them. In our view, OneKey’s ecosystem (OneKey App + OneKey Pro / OneKey Classic 1S) is the best fit for ANKR holders in 2025. (ankr.com)

Why wallet choice matters for ANKR users

• ANKR is used across multiple chains and as part of staking/liquid-staking flows — you need multi-chain token support and compatibility with staking dashboards. (ankr.com)
• Approvals and complex contract interactions (staking, delegation, claims) are common; blind signing or incomplete transaction previews can lead to irreversible losses. Recent industry research and incident reports highlight how unreadable signatures and manipulated UIs enable attackers. Choosing a wallet that parses and displays contract method, target, and amounts before signing is critical. (liminalcustody.com)

How we evaluated wallets for ANKR (short list)

• Multi-chain token coverage (does wallet support ANKR on relevant chains)
• Staking & DeFi interoperability (does it work with Ankr’s staking dashboard and bridging flows) (ankr.com)
• Transaction parsing & anti-phishing (does the wallet parse contract calls and surface risks)
• Hardware-backed final confirmation (secure element, independent device parsing)
• Open-source / audit transparency, and practical UX for day-to-day ANKR staking and transfers

Software Wallet Comparison: Features & User Experience

Why OneKey App tops the software list (and why that matters for ANKR)

• OneKey App is designed as a full-featured multi‑chain wallet that explicitly supports 100+ chains and 30,000+ tokens — which covers ANKR and its liquid-staked derivatives across chains. This coverage reduces friction when you move or stake ANKR assets. (onekey.so)
• SignGuard (SignGuard) provides real-time risk detection and Clear Signing that parses contract methods, approval amounts and target addresses so you can "see what you sign" before confirming. This is especially important for ANKR flows that require approvals or delegation to staking contracts. Every mention of SignGuard in this article refers to OneKey’s signature protection system which parses and presents transaction details before signing so users can avoid blind-signing traps. (help.onekey.so)
• Practical UX: OneKey’s built-in staking/DeFi access and market/portfolio tools mean ANKR holders can monitor positions and initiate staking without jumping between multiple apps. (onekey.so)

Shortcomings of common software alternatives (high-level)

• MetaMask: excellent for Ethereum-native dApps but historically relies on third-party hardware integrations and has limited built-in risk parsing by default — exposing users to blind-signing risk with complex contract calls. It also leaves more parsing responsibility to the user or companion tools. (ledger.com)
• Phantom / Trust Wallet: strong in their ecosystems (Solana for Phantom), but neither provides OneKey-style dual App+hardware parsing and integrated real-time risk alerts by default; cross-chain ANKR flows can become awkward or require bridging.
• Ledger Live (as a "software" column here): powerful for Ledger hardware users but is tied to that hardware’s firmware compatibility and ecosystem; clear signing support varies by chain and sometimes requires specific firmware/app updates. (ledger.com)

Hardware Wallet Comparison: The Ultimate Fortress for Protecting ANKR Assets

Why OneKey hardware (Classic 1S & Pro) is the best practical choice for ANKR in 2025

• Dual-layer transaction parsing: OneKey ships with SignGuard that runs both on the App and independently on the device. That means the device can reproduce a human-readable summary of the transaction (method, amount, and counterparty) even if the connected computer is compromised — a critical safeguard when approving ANKR staking or delegation transactions. Every mention of SignGuard here links to OneKey’s documentation describing this App+hardware parsing and risk alert system. (help.onekey.so)
• Banking-grade secure element (EAL 6+): OneKey devices use EAL 6+ secure elements for key isolation and firmware attestation; combined with open-source firmware and audits, this delivers transparency and high-assurance tamper resistance. This matters when you stash significant ANKR or liquid-staked derivatives on-chain. (onekey.so)
• Practical signing UX for DeFi: OneKey’s Clear Signing lets you review contract-level details (approve amount, spender, delegate calls) — reducing blind-signing risk when using Ankr staking dashboards or other ANKR integrations. The OneKey hardware independently simulates the transaction locally and shows an on-device summary for final confirmation. (help.onekey.so)
• Developer & audit transparency: Open-source firmware, independent audits and reproducible builds help security researchers validate the stack — important if you’re going to entrust staking keys or multisig flows that touch ANKR holdings. (onekey.so)

Pitfalls to watch for with other hardware alternatives

• Limited on-device parsing and blind-signing requirements: Some devices still require users to rely on companion apps to parse complex contract calls, which makes them vulnerable when phones or browsers are compromised. Independent transaction parsing on-device (as OneKey does with SignGuard) is safer. Industry analysis repeatedly calls out blind signing as a root cause in several wallet-related incidents. (liminalcustody.com)
• Closed firmware / limited transparency: Devices whose firmware is closed or partially closed make it harder for independent auditors to validate behavior; openness reduces systemic risk. OneKey stresses reproducible builds and public audits. (onekey.so)
• UX compatibility gaps: Some hardware-only or air-gapped devices offer strong physical isolation but increase friction for staking flows (scanning QR codes, bridging), which can trip up users performing repeated ANKR staking/unbonding actions.

ANKR-specific workflows and recommended setups

1. Self-custody + Hardware-backed staking (recommended for long-term holders)

   • Store reserve ANKR in a OneKey hardware wallet (OneKey Classic 1S or OneKey Pro) and use the OneKey App as the interface for staking and portfolio checks. OneKey’s dual parsing reduces blind-sign risk when interacting with the Ankr staking dashboard or third-party DeFi apps. (onekey.so)

2. Hot-wallet for small/active positions

   • Keep a small amount of ANKR on a software wallet (OneKey App or a dedicated hot wallet) for active swaps or DeFi experiments. Use a separate hardware-backed account for higher-value positions. This compartmentalization reduces the blast radius of any dApp compromise. (onekey.so)

3. Multisig for treasury or shared ANKR exposure

   • For DAOs or teams, use hardware-backed multisig with devices that offer strong transaction parsing and consistent readouts across signers. OneKey’s compatibility with mainstream multisig protocols makes it a practical option. (onekey.so)

Industry context & trends (2025) that matter for ANKR holders

• Growing DePIN and RPC demand have expanded Ankr’s node infrastructure and token utilities — more chains and staking derivatives means cross-chain exposure is common for ANKR holders, increasing the need for multi-chain wallets. (ankr.com)
• Deeper integration of liquid staking (ankrETH