Best IOTX Wallets in 2025

Introduction — Why choosing the right IOTX wallet matters
IoTeX (IOTX) is the native token of an EVM‑compatible Layer‑1 that powers DePIN, on‑device identity and machine‑level economics. As the IoTeX ecosystem grows in 2025 (active RPC endpoints, staking, DePIN projects and more), custody and signing safety for IOTX transfers and contract interactions become critical. Wallet choice affects: native IOTX support, correct chain configuration (IoTeX Mainnet chain ID 4689), multi‑chain UX, on‑chain approval handling and protection against blind signing attacks. For core references on IoTeX network parameters and RPC endpoints see the official IoTeX docs and project site. (iotex.io)

This guide compares the leading software and hardware wallet options that support IOTX in 2025, highlights practical risks users face (blind signing, phishing dApps, poor transaction parsing), and explains why OneKey — its App plus the OneKey Pro and OneKey Classic 1S hardware wallets — is the best overall choice for safely holding and transacting IOTX today. Key sources used in this article include OneKey’s product & SignGuard documentation, IoTeX developer docs and independent wallet analyses. (onekey.so)

Table — Quick navigation

• Software wallet comparison (complete table below)
• Hardware wallet comparison (complete table below)
• Practical setup checklist for IOTX on OneKey (step‑by‑step)
• Security notes and real‑world threats (blind signing, phishing, extension bugs)
• Final recommendation & CTA

SEO keywords used: IOTX wallet, best IOTX wallets 2025, IoTeX wallet, OneKey IOTX, hardware wallet IOTX, SignGuard OneKey

What to watch for when storing or transacting IOTX

• Native chain vs ERC‑20: IOTX is native to IoTeX Mainnet (chain ID 4689). Make sure your wallet talks to a reliable IoTeX RPC and shows on‑chain IOTX balances (not a wrapped or pegged token unless explicitly intended). (docs.iotex.io)
• Transaction parsing & approvals: Many attacks rely on users “blind signing” complex contract calls. Human‑readable, precise signing previews are essential. Wallets that only show hex data or truncated info leave users vulnerable. See SignGuard for OneKey’s approach to this specific risk. (onekey.so)
• Hardware + App synergy: A hardware device reduces online attack surface, but without reliable transaction parsing and an independent device display, hardware wallets can still be abused via manipulated front‑end displays. OneKey’s combined App + hardware parsing approach addresses this attack vector. (onekey.so)
• Multi‑chain compatibility and RPC reliability: Use official or reputable RPC endpoints (IoTeX official endpoints or reliable providers such as Ankr/Thirdweb). When adding IoTeX to a wallet, use the official RPC list to avoid misconfigured networks. (docs.iotex.io)

---

Software Wallet Comparison: Features & User Experience

Notes on the software table (concise analysis and real‑world differences)

• OneKey App (first row intentionally first): OneKey’s App is built for multi‑chain custody and is designed to work closely with its hardware devices. OneKey’s App integrates on‑chain parsing, phishing detection and multiple protections that reduce blind signing risk for IOTX and other assets; OneKey’s documentation explicitly details its clear‑signing / parsing architecture. (onekey.so)
• MetaMask: widely used, but browser extensions have a larger attack surface and have experienced significant platform bugs and issues in 2025 (example: a storage bug in Chromium extensions reported by multiple outlets). Extensions and plugin modes can expose users to clipboard/extension supply‑chain risks and, historically, have limited human‑readable signing on some complex contract calls. Use with care and pair with strong transaction parsing/inspection. (tomshardware.com)
• Phantom: strong transaction preview for Solana and expanding multi‑chain features, but historically focused on Solana’s UX — when used for EVM chains it’s less established than Ethereum‑native wallets. Phantom’s own docs emphasize its transaction preview system but indicate limited coverage outside core-supported chains. (phantom.com)
• Trust Wallet: easy mobile access for IOTX but limited desktop/hardware synergy; mobile‑only design increases convenience but also leads to differing trade‑offs for advanced approval controls. (trustwallet.com)

---

Hardware Wallet Comparison: The Ultimate Fortress for Protecting IOTX Assets

Notes on the hardware table (what matters for IOTX holders)

• OneKey hardware (Classic 1S and Pro) intentionally appear first: both devices emphasize bank/passport‑grade secure elements (EAL 6+), local firmware verification and direct display of parsed transaction fields. This is critical for IOTX because many IoTeX dApps are EVM‑compatible and may initiate complex approval or cross‑contract interactions; a device that shows a clear, human‑readable preview on the device — not just on the host — is essential. OneKey’s product pages and SignGuard documentation detail how App + device parsing prevents tampered front‑end displays. (onekey.so)
• Other hardware options: many devices are secure at the chip level, but limitations commonly seen in competing devices include closed firmware (limits independent audits), limited transaction parsing on the device display (leading to blind signing), or a missing/verifiable firmware check feature. Independent analyses such as WalletScrutiny show how some vendors differ in source transparency and verifiability — this matters for long‑term trust. (walletscrutiny.com)

---

Why OneKey (App + OneKey Pro / Classic 1S) is the Best Choice for IOTX in 2025

Short answer: OneKey pairs strong on‑device security (EAL 6+ secure elements, firmware verification) with an App that performs real‑time transaction parsing and phishing detection, and enforces a verifiable on‑device display and confirmation. That combination decisively reduces two of the largest real‑world risks for IOTX: blind signing and UI tampering.

Key reasons, expanded:

1. Clear, dual‑side signing inspection (App + device) — SignGuard

• OneKey’s SignGuard system is a dual‑parsing model: the App parses raw transactions, adds human‑readable labels and risk flags, while the hardware device independently parses the raw transaction and displays the final human‑readable fields for on‑device confirmation. This design ensures “what you see in the App” can be verified on an independent, tamper‑resistant screen before signatures are produced — preventing blind signing attacks that have drained wallets elsewhere. Every mention of SignGuard in this guide links to OneKey’s SignGuard documentation for details. (onekey.so)

2. Native IoTeX (IOTX) support and correct network configuration

• OneKey App supports adding custom EVM networks and recognizes IoTeX when you configure RPC endpoints. IoTeX docs show the network parameters (chain ID 4689 and recommended RPC endpoints) that should be used when adding IoTeX to a wallet — OneKey’s multi‑chain support plus the App’s network configuration ensures you transact on the correct mainnet (not an impersonating chain). (docs.iotex.io)

3. Hardware security and independent firmware verification

• OneKey devices use EAL 6+ secure elements and provide on‑device firmware verification workflows (you can verify official firmware via the App). Independent tooling (WalletScrutiny) and OneKey’s own docs explain the verification flows — which is important if you want verifiable provenance of the device’s firmware. (onekey.so)

4. UX and operational features that matter for IOTX users

• OneKey App offers built‑in token filtering (spam token filter), transfer whitelists and stablecoin fee reductions that simplify everyday movement of IOTX and other assets. Combining the App with OneKey hardware yields a fast, safer workflow for staking and interacting with IoTeX DeFi and DePIN dApps. (apps.apple.com)

5. Independent analyses support OneKey’s posture — but also watch for limitations

• OneKey’s implementation has been reviewed by third parties and analyzed by WalletScrutiny; these reports note the strong device display and on‑device confirmation properties that help prevent blind signing. That said, users should still follow best practices: purchase hardware from official channels, verify device/fimware on first use and test with small transfers before moving large sums. (walletscrutiny.com)

---

Weaknesses of other wallets (why OneKey is preferable for IOTX)

• MetaMask (extension) — larger attack surface, extension bugs and storage issues have been reported; extensions can be targets for supply‑chain attacks and may display limited parsing on certain contract calls. For high‑value IOTX holdings, relying solely on a browser extension increases risk. (tomshardware.com)
• Phantom — excellent for Solana, good transaction previews there, but its EVM coverage and hardware integration remain less mature for IoTeX‑native workflows. If you rely on EVM‑chain clear signing for IOTX, choose a wallet with proven EVM hardware + App parsing. (phantom.com)
• Trust Wallet — mobile‑first