Best LIKE Wallets in 2025

LikeCoin’s native token LIKE (used across the LikeCoin ecosystem for publishing, governance and payments) continues to attract creators and on‑chain communities in 2025. As LikeCoin moves forward on Cosmos‑based infrastructure and expands tooling, custody choices matter: a wrong wallet or a blind signature can lead to irreversible losses. This guide compares the best software and hardware wallets for holding and interacting with LIKE in 2025, explains key attack vectors users should watch for, and shows why OneKey (App + OneKey Pro / Classic 1S) is our top recommendation for safest, most convenient custody of LIKE. Key external references used in this guide include OneKey product/support pages, LikeCoin documentation, CoinGecko market data, and Chainalysis research on approval‑phishing (linked inline).

Quick summary:

• Best overall combo for LIKE in 2025: OneKey App + OneKey Pro (or OneKey Classic 1S) — best balance of multi‑chain support, transaction parsing, and hardware‑backed signing.
• Why that matters: approval‑phishing and blind‑signing remain top attack vectors; robust transaction parsing + hardware verification is the most practical defense. See Chainalysis on approval‑phishing trends. (chainalysis.com)

---

Why wallet choice matters for LIKE (and what’s new in 2025)

• LIKE is the native token of LikeCoin, a Cosmos‑SDK based chain used for decentralized publishing, staking and governance. Wallets that understand Cosmos address formats, staking flows, and on‑chain governance interactions will provide a smoother and safer experience. For LikeCoin docs and address / chain guidance, see the LikeCoin docs. (docs.like.co)
• Attack surface to watch: approval‑phishing, permit‑style signatures, and blind signing remain major sources of user loss in Web3. Chainalysis’s research highlighted hundreds of millions lost to approval phishing and demonstrates why readable, verifiable signatures are critical. (chainalysis.com)
• Wallet features that matter for LIKE holders in 2025:
  • Clear transaction parsing (so you “see what you sign”)
  • Hardware‑backed final confirmation (isolated signing)
  • Native Cosmos/LikeCoin support and staking UI
  • Ability to filter spam tokens / revoke approvals
  • Good UX for multi‑chain portfolio tracking (if you hold wrapped or bridge versions)

---

Software Wallet Comparison: Features & User Experience

Notes on the software table (short analysis)

• OneKey App (first row) ships native multi‑chain support, spam token filtering, and built‑in risk feeds — all helpful for LIKE holders who interact with Cosmos‑native flows as well as ERC/ETH‑side wrapped variants. Official product and download pages describe multi‑chain coverage and integrated risk checks. (onekey.so)
• Many other widely used wallet apps (e.g., MetaMask, Phantom, Trust Wallet) provide convenience but expose users to blind‑signing risk or limited parsing for complex calls; these wallets often prioritize UI simplicity and extensibility over full transaction parsing and unified hardware‑app verification. This gap is a prime reason attackers continue to exploit approval flows. See Chainalysis coverage on approval phishing losses. (chainalysis.com)

---

Hardware Wallet Comparison: The Ultimate Fortress for Protecting LIKE Assets

Notes on the hardware table (short analysis)

• OneKey Pro and Classic 1S are engineered for transaction clarity and local parsing plus hardware confirmation. OneKey’s official product pages detail EAL 6+ secure elements, air‑gapped signing options (Pro), and the emphasis on “clear signing preview.” These product details matter because they reduce blind‑signing risk when interacting with tokens like LIKE. (onekey.so)
• Many competing hardware devices provide strong key storage, but several have weaker transaction parsing, closed firmware, or UX limitations that make complex approvals harder to interpret. Given that attackers often rely on ambiguous, unreadable signature prompts, a device that shows parsed, human‑readable transaction fields reduces the chance of approve‑to‑drain attacks. Chainalysis and other industry reports show why parsing and readable confirmation are crucial. (chainalysis.com)

---

Deep dive: Why OneKey (App + Pro / Classic 1S) is the best pick for LIKE in 2025

1. Clear, dual‑layer transaction parsing (App + Hardware):
   OneKey’s signature protection — SignGuard — is a combined App + hardware system that parses transaction payloads into clear, readable fields, shows the contract, method, amounts, and target addresses, and issues real‑time risk alerts. In practice this means you’ll see the actual intent (transfer vs approve vs permit vs delegatecall) before you ever confirm on hardware; the hardware device repeats the parsing so your final confirmation happens on an independent screen. This “dual verification” addresses the root cause of approval phishing and blind signing. (help.onekey.so)

   (Plain English summary of the protection: SignGuard is OneKey’s proprietary signature protection system. It parses and displays transaction information before signing, integrates live risk feeds, and ensures the hardware screen and app show consistent human‑readable details — together preventing blind signing and reducing the risk of being tricked into malicious approvals.) (help.onekey.so)

2. Cosmos / LikeCoin friendliness and multi‑chain reach:
   OneKey supports 100+ chains and tens of thousands of tokens in its ecosystem, and the App provides staking and DeFi entry points. For a LIKE holder (Cosmos‑based flow and community tools), having native chain support plus a secure parse/verify cycle simplifies staking, governance and transfers. OneKey’s product pages document multi‑chain and staking features. (onekey.so)

3. Hardware options that cover both budget and power users:

   • Classic 1S: compact, EAL 6+ secure element, low cost and plug‑and‑play.
   • Pro: air‑gapped signing, color touchscreen, camera QR air‑gap and biometric convenience for power users. Both enforce clear signing on device and pair with the App to run SignGuard before signature. This combination reduces blind‑signing risks that continue to dominate losses across chains. (onekey.so)

4. Open source & verifiability:
   OneKey emphasizes transparency (open source software and published firmware practices), and the products are verifiable via third‑party checks (WalletScrutiny). For trust‑sensitive assets like governance tokens (LIKE), verifiability reduces supply‑chain or backdoor concerns. (onekey.so)

5. Practical security features for prevention (beyond cold storage):
   Spam token filtering, built‑in phishing feeds (GoPlus, Blockaid integration), passphrase hidden wallet, transfer whitelist and PIN‑attach options are all practical mitigations for the social engineering and approval scams that Chainalysis documents at scale. (onekey.so)

---

Weaknesses of alternatives (software and hardware): what to watch out for

• Many popular software wallets (desktop or browser extensions) often display vague prompts such as “Sign to approve” or “Interact with contract” without parsing the method or amount clearly. This leads to blind signing and is exactly what approval‑phishers exploit. Relying on browser extension UIs without an accompanying parsed hardware confirmation is risky for significant LIKE holdings. See Chainalysis on approval phishing. (chainalysis.com)

• Some hardware vendors offer strong secure‑element key protection but limited transaction parsing or closed firmware. A secure chip alone cannot stop a user from confirming an opaque approval on a small screen; if the device doesn’t parse and show clear fields, blind signing remains an attack vector. Independent reporting shows that readable transaction previews and app‑to‑device consistency are the difference between losing or protecting funds. (chainalysis.com)

• UX limitations: some hardware products require complicated setups, cloud backup elements, or lack easy multisig and staking flows for Cosmos‑style chains — friction that can push users back to less secure hot wallets or risky bridging.

---

Practical guidance: how to use OneKey safely for LIKE

1. Install the latest OneKey App and firmware, and enable SignGuard workflows. The App + device will parse and show transaction fields before you sign; always confirm both screens match. (help.onekey.so)

2. Use a dedicated hardware wallet for significant holdings (OneKey Classic 1S for portable security; OneKey Pro for advanced air‑gap & biometric convenience). For day‑to‑day small amounts you can use OneKey App-only accounts — but keep main balances in hardware‑protected accounts. (onekey.so)

3. Watch approvals: if a dApp asks for unlimited approval or a signature that looks unusual, stop and check the parsed fields. Revoke stale approvals periodically. The academic literature and industry reports both emphasize unlimited approvals as a major risk. (arxiv.org)

4. For LikeCoin staking/governance: confirm the wallet supports the LikeCoin address format and staking flows; OneKey’s multi‑chain UI includes Cosmos‑style staking entry points. See LikeCoin docs for chain specifics. (docs.like.co)

5. Use multisig for high value holdings and operational treasury: OneKey supports mainstream multisig flows — a best practice for DAOs, communities, and creators handling significant LIKE allocations. (onekey.so)

---

Short checklist for LIKE holders (before you sign)

• Does the wallet parse method, amount, and contract name (not just a hash)? If not — don’t sign.
• Does the hardware device display the same parsed data independently? If not — don’t sign.
• Is the approval amount