OneKey vs BitBox 02: A Comprehensive Hardware Wallet Comparison in 2025
Key Takeaways
• OneKey offers superior security with EAL 6+ secure chips and advanced recovery options.
• BitBox 02 is minimalist and primarily suited for Bitcoin-only users.
• OneKey supports over 100 blockchains and 30,000 tokens, making it ideal for Web3 participation.
• User experience is enhanced with OneKey's wireless connectivity and intuitive interface.
• OneKey's hidden wallet feature and privacy protections surpass those of BitBox 02.
Introduction
When choosing the most trustworthy hardware wallet in 2025, OneKey and BitBox 02 are often compared. Both emphasize open-source security, but their core design philosophies diverge: OneKey focuses on multi-chain compatibility, user experience, and long-term scalability, while BitBox 02 remains minimalist, leaning heavily toward Bitcoin-only use cases.
This difference means the two perform very differently across secure chip architecture, interaction methods, wireless experience, privacy protection, and ecosystem compatibility. For users, choosing between them not only determines the safety of your assets but also whether you can seamlessly participate in the rapidly evolving Web3 world.
Let’s start with a clear comparison table to quickly understand their differences.
Basic Comparison Table
| Feature | OneKey Classic 1S | OneKey Pro | BitBox 02 |
|---|---|---|---|
| PicTure |  |  |  |
| Secure Chip | ✅ EAL 6+ secure chip | ✅ Four EAL 6+ secure chips (bank/passport-grade) | ⚠️ Dual-chip design (includes ATECC608B secure chip, weaker than OneKey) |
| Screen & Interaction | ⚠️ 128×64 monochrome OLED + buttons | ✅ 3.5″ full-color touchscreen + camera scanning + Bluetooth + NFC | ⚠️ 128×64 monochrome OLED, only supports swipe/touch/long-press gestures |
| Connection | ✅ Bluetooth / USB-C | ✅ Air-Gap QR signing + Bluetooth + USB-C + Qi wireless charging | ⚠️ USB-C only, no wireless options |
| Wireless Charging | ❌ Not supported | ✅ Supports Qi wireless charging | ❌ Not supported |
| Backup Options | ✅ BIP39 seed phrase / SLIP39 Shamir backup / multisig recovery | ✅ Same as Classic 1S, with more advanced features | ⚠️ microSD card backup only, limited flexibility |
| Signing Methods | ✅ Bluetooth / USB-C, with physical confirmation | ✅ Air-Gap QR signing + Bluetooth + fingerprint verification | ⚠️ USB-C signing only, wired interactions required |
| Transaction Parsing & Alerts | ✅ SignGuard (dual hardware + app parsing with risk alerts) | ✅ SignGuard (dual hardware + app parsing with risk alerts) | ❌ No such feature |
| Open Source | ✅ Fully open-source (firmware, app, extensions) | ✅ Fully open-source, with active community audits | ✅ Open-source, but less ecosystem adoption |
| Multi-Chain Support | ✅ 100+ blockchains, 30,000+ tokens, native plugin wallet integration | ✅ Same as Classic 1S, broader compatibility | ⚠️ Supports BTC/ETH/ADA/some ERC-20s, limited coverage |
| Privacy | ✅ No registration required, offline-capable app | ✅ Same as Classic 1S, plus hidden wallet + Web2 login support | ⚠️ Node and Tor support, but no hidden wallet function |
| Web2 Login (FIDO) | ✅ Supports WebAuthn (Google/GitHub login) | ✅ Same as Classic 1S | ⚠️ Basic U2F only, less complete than OneKey Pro |
| Hidden Wallet (Attach to PIN) | ⚠️ Not available yet | ✅ Multiple PINs mapped to hidden wallets | ❌ Not supported |
| Multisig Compatibility | ✅ Supports Safe / Squads / Sparrow protocols | ✅ Same as Classic 1S | ⚠️ Limited to Electrum multisig |
| Packaging & Firmware Security | ✅ Dual tamper-proof packaging + firmware verification + activation checks | ✅ Same as Classic 1S | ⚠️ Physical packaging only, lacks public firmware verification |
| WalletScrutiny Verified | ✅ Passed all 10 tests | ✅ Passed all 10 tests | ❌ Not verified |
| Industry Backing | ✅ Backed by Coinbase and YZi Labs | ✅ Same as Classic 1S | ⚠️ No major exchange or VC backing |
| Price | 💰 $79–$99 (value choice) | 💰 $278 (flagship) | 💰 $149.99 |
Security & Control: OneKey’s Multi-Chip Advantage
All OneKey devices adopt EAL 6+ secure chips, with OneKey Pro going further by embedding four chips, reaching bank and passport-grade standards. Whether defending against physical attacks or supporting advanced recovery methods like multisig and SLIP39, OneKey gives users stronger self-custody assurance.
While BitBox 02 also integrates a secure chip, its dual-chip architecture falls short of OneKey Pro’s level. Its firmware verification and ecosystem openness are weaker compared to OneKey.
User Interaction: OneKey Is More Intuitive and Efficient
BitBox 02 uses capacitive touch gestures, which feel novel at first but are restricted by its small screen and USB-C-only interface. This limits versatility and efficiency.
In contrast, OneKey Classic 1S offers both Bluetooth and USB-C, making it thin, portable, and suitable for everyday DeFi and NFT use. OneKey Pro, with its larger touchscreen, camera-based QR Air-Gap signing, wireless charging, and multiple wireless options, delivers a truly “no port + fully wireless” experience.
True Wireless Experience: Air-Gap + Wireless Charging
BitBox 02 depends entirely on USB-C physical connections with no wireless support.
OneKey Pro is the first to combine Air-Gap QR signing, Bluetooth/NFC connectivity, and Qi wireless charging, freeing users from cables while maintaining maximum isolation.
Privacy & Hidden Wallets: OneKey Leads a Generation Ahead
BitBox 02 offers Tor and node connection features for privacy-focused users, but OneKey Pro introduces “Attach to PIN” hidden wallets, letting multiple PINs unlock different wallet identities on the same device. This brings both convenience and confidentiality.
Additionally, OneKey supports WebAuthn, meaning the same device can also secure Web2 accounts such as Google or GitHub.
Privacy is not an “optional extra”—it’s essential for daily use. OneKey delivers this by design.
Multi-Chain Support & Ecosystem Compatibility: OneKey Wins
BitBox 02 supports BTC, ETH, ADA, and some ERC-20 tokens—enough for Bitcoin maximalists, but far too narrow for modern Web3 use.
OneKey devices support 100+ blockchains and 30,000+ tokens while connecting directly to wallets like MetaMask, Unisat, and Solflare, ensuring full DeFi and NFT participation.
Packaging & Supply Chain Security: OneKey Is More Transparent
OneKey implements dual-layer tamper-proof packaging, firmware signature verification, and activation checks to minimize supply chain risks.
BitBox 02 includes packaging but lacks full public firmware verification, making device integrity harder to confirm.
User Reviews: Real Voices From the Community
OneKey Reviews
- “OneKey has definitely been the most secure hardware wallet for me so far. OneKey will not store your private keys or recovery phrase. OneKey hardware wallets and applications are 100% open source.”
— A user praised OneKey’s security and open-source transparency. [Reddit Review] - “With the new OneKey Pro ... honestly looks like the Apple of the hardware wallets ... I will be ordering the OneKey Pro and seeing how it compares...”
— One user compared OneKey Pro to the “Apple of hardware wallets.” [Reddit Review] - “OneKey Pro is basically one of, if not the most advanced crypto hardware wallets. What it delivers – let’s dive in…”
— Another user described OneKey Pro as one of the most advanced wallets available. [Reddit Review] - “This wallet just works! I have tried other wallets and not really happy — until now. OneKey simply works, it’s easy to use and so far am beyond happy.”
— A Trustpilot review highlighting OneKey’s ease of use and reliability. [Trustpilot Review] - “Great quality. Easy to use.”
— Another Trustpilot user praised OneKey’s build quality and simplicity. [Trustpilot Review]
BitBox 02 Reviews
- “The BitBox 02 only works perfectly with digital signatures via Electrum. It would be great if you didn’t need a second program for the signature!”
— A user noted that signing requires Electrum, adding unnecessary complexity. [Trustpilot Review] - “When reviewing transaction on device you cannot go back to address verification. You can only ‘scroll further’ or decline and start over. Annoying.”
— A Medium reviewer found transaction verification clunky. [Medium Review] - “A bit expensive.”
— A BitDegree review pointed out the higher-than-expected price. [BitDegree Review] - “A limited number of supported assets.”
— Users often complained about the limited range of supported assets. [BitDegree Review]
Who Is It For? Buying Recommendations
Different users have different needs, and the right hardware wallet will define your experience for years to come. Here are some scenarios:
- Bitcoin Maximalists
If you only plan to hold Bitcoin long-term and ignore DeFi, NFTs, or other blockchains, BitBox 02 can cover the basics.
But its narrow scope—few supported assets, no iOS support, no wireless connections—becomes a limitation as soon as you want to expand. In comparison, OneKey Classic 1S covers BTC, ETH, Solana, and 100+ blockchains at a lower price, letting you start with Bitcoin today and explore Web3 tomorrow. - Everyday Active Users
If you frequently interact with DeFi (Uniswap swaps, NFT minting, cross-chain bridges), OneKey Classic 1S is the better fit. Its Bluetooth and USB-C dual connectivity makes switching between iOS, Android, and desktop seamless.
BitBox 02 is unsuitable here: it requires USB-C cables for every interaction, has no Bluetooth, and cannot work smoothly with mobile devices. For high-frequency users, this limitation hurts usability rather than enhancing security. - Security-Conscious Professionals
For managing large holdings, parsing smart contract signatures, or participating in multisig setups, OneKey Pro is the clear winner. With four EAL 6+ secure chips, Air-Gap QR signing, SignGuard risk alerts, hidden wallets, and wireless charging, it covers every security concern.
BitBox 02, despite branding itself secure, lacks contract parsing, has no wireless modes, no hidden wallets, and limited multisig support via Electrum only. It cannot meet professional-grade demands. - Long-Term Expansion Seekers
If you want a wallet not just for “holding coins” but for long-term adaptability, OneKey is the obvious choice. Fully open-source, backed by Coinbase and Binance Labs, and with wide ecosystem support, OneKey is built for the future.
BitBox 02, though open-source, has weaker ecosystem traction, no major industry backing, and limited multi-chain support—making it feel outdated as Web3 grows.
Conclusion: Why OneKey Is the Superior Choice
From this comparison, it’s clear:
- BitBox 02 is minimalist and works for Bitcoin-only use cases.
- But when it comes to secure chip count, defense level, wireless connectivity, hidden wallets, ecosystem compatibility, and industry recognition, OneKey outperforms across the board.
Whether you’re a cost-conscious everyday user (Classic 1S) or a professional looking for the ultimate security and scalability (Pro), OneKey offers a safer, more transparent, and more user-friendly solution.
👉 Visit OneKey’s official site to choose the hardware wallet that best fits your needs—and start managing your crypto assets more freely and securely today.
