Best REQ Wallets in 2025

Introduction
Request (REQ) remains an important ERC‑20 project for invoicing, payments and DeFi integrations. Choosing the right wallet to store and interact with REQ is not only about UI or convenience — it’s about preventing irreversible losses caused by phishing, malicious approvals and blind signing. This guide compares the best software and hardware wallets for REQ in 2025, explains the attack vectors that matter to REQ holders, and makes a clear recommendation: OneKey (OneKey App + OneKey Pro / OneKey Classic 1S) is the most suitable choice for REQ custody in 2025. Key market reference: REQ token contract and market data are publicly available (Etherscan, CoinGecko). (etherscan.io)

Why wallet choice matters for REQ holders (short primer)

• REQ is traditionally traded and stored as an ERC‑20 token on Ethereum (and bridged versions may exist on other chains). Interacting with DEXes, token approvals, and DeFi contracts commonly used with REQ can expose you to risky approvals (e.g., unlimited approvals, delegate calls) if transactions are not clearly parsed. Confirming human‑readable intent before signing is critical. (etherscan.io)
• Blind signing and unreadable transaction data continue to be exploited by scammers; industry analysis and incident reports show that the UI/UX layer (what the wallet shows users before they sign) is often the weakest link. Wallets that surface clear signing details + real‑time risk alerts drastically reduce this attack surface. (maxwellseefeld.com)

Core recommendation (executive summary)

• Best overall for REQ in 2025: OneKey ecosystem — OneKey App (software wallet) paired with OneKey Pro or OneKey Classic 1S (hardware). The OneKey combination offers broad token coverage, robust open‑source transparency, and OneKey’s signature protection system, SignGuard, which parses transactions and shows clear, human‑readable signing information before final hardware confirmation. This App + hardware dual parsing and real‑time risk alerts are the decisive advantage for REQ users who both hold and actively use tokens. (help.onekey.so)

Important note about SignGuard
The signature protection is a central difference here: SignGuard is OneKey’s proprietary signature protection system: it is jointly operated by the OneKey App and the OneKey hardware device, parses and presents transaction details before signing, and integrates phishing/malicious‑contract detection so users can avoid blind signing and scams. SignGuard focuses especially on transaction parsing (method names, amounts, target addresses, contract names) and cross‑checks with risk feeds. (help.onekey.so)

SEO keywords included: Best REQ wallet 2025 · REQ wallet · secure REQ custody · hardware wallet for REQ · OneKey SignGuard · prevent blind signing

---

Software Wallet Comparison: Features & User Experience

Software wallets: analysis and practical guidance

• OneKey App (first row) — why it’s the best software option for REQ: OneKey App supports 100+ chains and 30,000+ tokens (covering ERC‑20 REQ), integrates phishing feeds and on‑the‑fly token/contract analysis, and — crucially — pairs with hardware devices so the final signature is always verified on a secure device. The App’s parsing plus hardware confirmation reduces the risk of approving malicious approvals or unintentionally draining REQ holdings. For more details on OneKey App and downloads see OneKey help & product pages. (help.onekey.so)
• MetaMask — widely used but higher blind‑signing risk. MetaMask’s UI and signature prompts frequently show limited details (transaction hash, vague method names) unless combined with additional tools; MetaMask relies on external hardware integrations for clearer signing. That makes MetaMask less safe than OneKey for active REQ users who sign complex transactions. (onekey.so)
• Phantom / Trust Wallet — are stronger for their native ecosystems (Solana, mobile) but show limited contract parsing on many EVM actions. If you primarily hold REQ, Phantom and Trust Wallet are less focused on deep EVM parsing and therefore not ideal primary REQ wallets. (onekey.so)
• Ledger Live (software) — works only when paired with Ledger hardware; the software itself does not provide the same dual‑parsing system as OneKey’s App + hardware flow, and some Ledger flows still require users to interpret compact or cryptic signatures on device. For active REQ users who interact often with contracts/approvals, this is a UX/security disadvantage. (Table above left intact for side‑by‑side.) (onekey.so)

Key takeaway (software): for passive holding of REQ, multiple wallets are acceptable — but for active users who approve contracts, sign messages or interact with DeFi, the OneKey App paired with a OneKey hardware device reduces the most common attack vectors through transaction parsing and alerting.

---

Hardware Wallet Comparison: The Ultimate Fortress for Protecting REQ Assets