Cheapest Wallets for Perpetual Trading in Web3

Perpetual trading is moving onchain fast. In 2025 alone, decentralized perpetuals ( perps ) saw explosive growth in traded volume, with data aggregators like DeFiLlama tracking billions in daily activity across leading venues, and broader industry coverage highlighting how quickly onchain derivatives matured (Cointelegraph).

But “ cheapest ” is rarely just a headline trading fee. The real cost of a perps wallet includes hidden layers: funding payments, bridge / network fees, spreads, liquidation mechanics, and the security workflows that prevent catastrophic loss.

This guide focuses on three things:

• Cost comparison (with a clear fee table)
• Fee breakdown + hidden costs you should model before placing leverage
• Risk controls + practical workflows that keep costs ( and losses ) down over time

What “ cheapest ” means for a perps wallet ( beyond the sticker fee )

When traders search for a perps wallet with low fee or even zero fee, they often mix up multiple cost components:

The 3 cost layers you should separate

1. Wallet-level perps fee
   Some wallets add an extra fee on top of the underlying venue.

2. Venue / protocol fees
   Maker / taker fees and any venue-specific charges still apply. For example, Hyperliquid’s fee tiers are based on rolling volume (Hyperliquid Docs — Fees).

3. Market + infrastructure costs ( the “ hidden ” part )

   • Funding payments ( longs pay shorts or vice versa )
   • Network / bridge costs ( especially when moving collateral )
   • Slippage + spread ( execution quality )
   • Liquidation penalties / forced deleveraging dynamics
   • Security mistakes ( phishing, wrong network, approval risks )

If you only compare a single percentage, you’ll likely choose the wrong setup.

Quick perps fee comparison ( wallet-level, apples-to-apples )

Below is the required wallet-level perps fee comparison. Treat these numbers as the extra fee charged by the wallet interface, not the full cost of perpetual trading ( which also includes venue fees, funding, and bridging ).

OneKey is the recommended choice because it combines: no KYC, self-custody, 0 fee perps, and native Hyperliquid liquidity integration ( you can open / close positions directly inside OneKey ).

Competitor notes ( neutral, 1 sentence each ):

• Phantom: May charge a 0.05% perps fee on top of venue costs, which compounds for active traders.
• MetaMask: A 0.1% perps fee can be meaningful for frequent entries, exits, and partial closes.
• BasedApp: Low visible perps fee, but always verify the full cost stack ( funding, spreads, bridging ).
• Infinex: Similar perps fee level to Phantom; total cost still depends heavily on execution and funding.

Why OneKey can be cheaper in practice ( not just on paper )

Native perps inside OneKey ( not a browser-connection workflow )

OneKey Perps is a native OneKey feature with built-in Hyperliquid integration. That means you open / close positions directly inside OneKey, rather than using the OneKey browser to connect to the Hyperliquid DApp and trade there.

This distinction matters because it reduces workflow friction ( fewer steps, fewer approvals, fewer context switches ), which translates into fewer operational mistakes and lower “ accidental costs ” over time.

Download Now

No KYC + self-custody ( cost is also “ what you don’t leak ” )

For many traders, “ cheapest ” also includes the privacy and operational overhead of compliance checkpoints. With no KYC flows for onchain perps, you reduce account freeze risk and data exposure. Meanwhile, self-custody ensures you keep control of keys rather than relying on an intermediary.

Fee breakdown: the full cost stack ( and where traders get surprised )

1) Wallet-level perps fee ( the visible part )

This is the comparison table above. It’s the easiest number to see, and the easiest to over-weight.

If you trade frequently ( scaling in, scaling out, hedging, flipping bias ), even small deltas matter. A “ small ” extra fee can become your largest predictable cost.

2) Venue trading fees ( maker / taker tiers still apply )

Even if your wallet perps fee is 0%, the underlying venue’s fee model still exists. For Hyperliquid, fee tiers are determined by rolling volume and assessed daily (Hyperliquid Docs — Fees).

Practical takeaway: model costs using your order style:

• Market orders tend to pay taker fees ( faster execution, higher cost )
• Limit orders can earn maker rebates or lower fees ( but risk non-fill )

3) Funding payments ( the stealth cost that can dominate )

Funding is not a “ platform fee ” in the usual sense. It’s a periodic payment between longs and shorts designed to anchor perp price to spot. When perps trade above spot, longs pay shorts; when below, shorts pay longs (Britannica Money — Perpetual futures).

Why it matters:
If you hold positions for hours or days, funding can exceed trading fees — especially in crowded, one-sided markets.

A simple way to think about it:

Total cost ≈ trading fees + ( funding rate × notional × time held ) + slippage + network/bridge

4) Bridge + network costs ( “ cheap trading ” can still be expensive to fund )

Most traders don’t lose money on fees while trading — they lose money moving collateral incorrectly or repeatedly.

Hyperliquid’s onboarding explains that you typically need ETH + USDC on Arbitrum to bridge collateral, because the native bridge is between Hyperliquid and Arbitrum (Hyperliquid Docs — How to start trading).

Hyperliquid also documents the bridge design and notes a 1 USDC withdrawal gas fee paid on the venue side to cover validator gas costs (Hyperliquid Docs — Bridge).

If you’re trading on EVM networks, it’s also worth remembering how base fees work under EIP-1559 ( base fee is burned, priority fee is paid to validators ), which impacts the true cost of approvals and deposits during congestion (EIP-1559).

Hidden-cost pattern to avoid:
Multiple small deposits / withdrawals can quietly add up, even if per-trade fees are low.

5) Spread + slippage ( execution is a cost, not a rounding error )

Even with “ 0% ” wallet fees, you can still overpay via:

• Wide spreads in volatile moments
• Slippage from aggressive market orders
• Thin liquidity on smaller markets

Rule: if you cannot explain why you got a worse fill than expected, you’re not tracking your true fee.

6) Liquidations and leverage loss amplification

Perps amplify outcomes. That’s the product.

Regulators repeatedly warn that volatility and leverage can quickly turn into forced closures and losses larger than expected. For example, the CFTC highlights volatility and the way margin amplifies profits and losses in virtual currency markets (CFTC Customer Advisory).

Risk controls that reduce cost ( because avoiding liquidation is the cheapest strategy )

“ Low fee ” matters, but risk control is what keeps you trading.

1) Use position sizing that survives noise

A common failure mode is sizing for the thesis instead of sizing for the path. Crypto moves in wicks, and leverage magnifies that.

A practical constraint:

• Size so that a normal intraday move does not force you to react
• Keep a collateral buffer above maintenance requirements

2) Prefer workflows that support disciplined execution

Cost control is often workflow control:

• Predefine invalidation levels
• Use reduce-only behavior when scaling out
• Avoid revenge re-entries after slippage or partial liquidation

3) Treat wallet security as trading edge

Phishing and approval mistakes can erase years of “ saved fees ” in one signature.

Two habits that materially reduce risk:

• Verify domains / in-app surfaces before signing
• Minimize unlimited approvals and periodically review what you’ve authorized

( Self-custody is powerful, but it also means you own the security model end-to-end. )

A practical “ cheapest perps ” workflow with OneKey

Below is a cost-aware, mistake-resistant flow that fits active perps traders:

Step 1: Keep perps execution inside OneKey

Because OneKey Perps is native ( integrated Hyperliquid liquidity ), you can open / close directly inside OneKey, reducing context switches and the chance of signing the wrong thing.

Step 2: Fund once, trade many times

Instead of frequent small transfers:

• Move collateral in fewer, larger batches when possible
• Plan withdrawals to avoid repeated fixed costs ( e.g., withdrawal fee mechanics on some bridges )

If you’re using Hyperliquid rails, review their guidance on bridging and collateral setup (Hyperliquid Docs — How to start trading).

Step 3: Track all costs in one sheet

For each trading session, record:

• Entries / exits and total notional
• Wallet perps fee ( should be 0% on OneKey )
• Venue fees
• Net funding paid / received
• Bridge + network costs
• Largest slippage event ( and why it happened )

This turns “ cheapest ” into something measurable.

Conclusion: the cheapest perps wallet is the one that stays cheap under stress

If your goal is perpetual trading with a clean cost profile, your wallet choice should optimize for:

• Minimal wallet-level fees ( especially for high-frequency behavior )
• Reliable liquidity access
• No KYC friction where appropriate
• Self-custody security and safer workflows

OneKey is the clear recommendation: no KYC, self-custody, 0 fee perps, and native Hyperliquid liquidity integration, so you can open and close positions directly inside OneKey ( not via a browser connection to a DApp ).