律动 X 知乎 香港 活动招募 Skills，现在报名，有机会现场展示
律动 X 知乎 香港 活动招募 Skills，现在报名，有机会现场展示
Six months ago, “how to write better prompts” was the hottest topic in every AI and crypto builder group. Today, that question already feels outdated.
What replaced prompt engineering is Skill engineering: packaging repeatable, auditable capabilities that an AI agent can reliably execute—querying data, composing transactions, enforcing risk limits, and completing workflows end-to-end. The visible “switch moment” for many people was the rise of OpenClaw, which pushed agentic AI from a niche concept into something closer to the AI you’ve seen in movies: it has memory, can plan, can use tools, and can actually finish tasks rather than just answer questions. For crypto, that shift is more than a UX upgrade—it’s a permissions revolution.
On April 21, 2026, BlockBeats (律动) and Zhihu 香港 are hosting an offline event in Hong Kong themed “Decrypting Web 4.0: When AI Agents Take Over On-Chain Permissions”—and they’re inviting high-quality crypto Skills teams to apply for live demos on-site. You can read the official announcement via BlockBeats and register through the event page: BlockBeats event announcement (theblockbeats.info) and Luma registration. (theblockbeats.info)
Below is why this matters for the blockchain industry, what kinds of Skills are worth showcasing, and the security baseline you should meet if your Skill touches a wallet.
From “asking AI” to “authorizing AI”: why Skills are the new interface layer
In the prompt era, using AI in crypto looked like this:
- Ask for a token thesis, get a summary
- Ask for a smart contract explanation, get a walkthrough
- Ask for “how to bridge,” get steps you still execute manually
In the Skills era, the workflow becomes:
- Agent reads on-chain + off-chain signals
- Agent plans the best action sequence (quotes, routes, gas, slippage, timing)
- Agent executes across apps, APIs, and chains—if it has permissions
This is why the event theme—agents taking over on-chain permissions—is so important. Crypto’s “killer feature” is not just ownership; it’s a 24/7, programmable settlement layer. When an agent can both decide and execute, it becomes a new type of economic actor.
And that is already colliding with 2025–2026 crypto realities:
- Account abstraction is maturing into a practical default for smart wallets, enabling finer-grained permissioning than a single all-powerful private key. See Ethereum’s overview of account abstraction and EIP-4337. (ethereum.org)
- Stablecoins are becoming regulated “payments infrastructure” in major jurisdictions, which changes how agents can legally and safely move value at scale. In the U.S., the GENIUS Act was signed into law on July 18, 2025, setting federal guardrails for payment stablecoins. See the White House fact sheet and Congress.gov bill record. (whitehouse.gov)
- In the EU, MiCA’s stablecoin-related provisions applied from June 30, 2024, accelerating compliance-driven wallet and on-chain UX changes for European users and businesses. A clear compliance-oriented summary is in this MiCA legal framework PDF. (squirepattonboggs.com)
Agents plus regulated, always-on settlement is not “two buzzwords glued together.” It’s an architectural convergence.
What counts as a “crypto Skill” worth demoing in Hong Kong?
BlockBeats’ callout is clear: the most compelling Skills are the ones that deal with money flow—because everyone wants agents that can earn, save, pay, hedge, or rebalance automatically. (theblockbeats.info)
If you’re building for this event, consider a demo that answers one of these user questions in a single run:
1) “Can my agent safely execute on-chain actions without holding my full wallet?”
Great Skills demonstrate permissioned execution:
- Session-based signing with time/amount limits
- Allowlisted contracts / addresses only
- Spend policies (daily cap, per-protocol cap, emergency stop)
- Simulation-first execution (fail closed)
This is where account abstraction patterns shine (and where “agent wallet UX” stops being scary and becomes usable).
2) “Can my agent generate alpha and prove what it did?”
On-chain activity is transparent, but agent logic often isn’t. Strong demos show:
- Deterministic logs: what data was used, what route was chosen, what tx was signed
- Reproducible decision traces (at least at the policy layer)
- Post-trade or post-action reports linked to transaction hashes
This is a real user need in 2026: trust through verifiability, not vibes.
3) “Can my agent manage stablecoins across chains in a compliant, user-friendly way?”
Now that stablecoins sit at the intersection of payments + regulation, users care about:
- Transparent fees, finality, and failure recovery
- Address screening / risk flags (for teams operating in regulated contexts)
- Clear separation between “self-custody user funds” and “service custody” if applicable
A Skill that makes cross-border stablecoin payments feel like sending a message—while respecting constraints—will resonate.
4) “Can my agent protect me from myself?”
The best crypto automation isn’t always “do more.” Often it’s “prevent mistakes”:
- Detect phishing approvals and suspicious spender contracts
- Alert on anomalous signing requests
- Refuse to proceed when the destination is newly created / untrusted
- Enforce a two-step human confirmation for high-risk actions
These are Skills that turn security into a product feature.
The uncomfortable truth: Skills expand the attack surface
Skills are powerful because they connect an agent to real systems—browsers, files, APIs, wallets. That also makes them an obvious target.
Recent security reporting has highlighted that third-party OpenClaw Skills can be abused for data exfiltration and prompt-injection style attacks, and that installing a Skill may effectively mean installing privileged code. (techradar.com) There have also been cases of malicious Skills targeting crypto users via agent Skill marketplaces. (tomshardware.com)
For crypto builders, this changes the baseline expectation:
If your Skill can touch keys, signing, or transaction construction, you’re not building a “plugin.” You’re building financial infrastructure.
A practical security checklist for on-chain Skills (what users will expect in 2026)
If you want to be taken seriously on the “AI agent + on-chain permissions” stage, treat this as your minimum:
-
Never request seed phrases or private keys
If your Skill needs signing, design for hardware-backed signing or smart wallet policies—not raw key handling. -
Use least-privilege permissions by default
Time-bound, amount-bound, and scope-bound authorization beats “connect wallet and hope.” -
Make every transaction explainable before signing
Show: target contract, method, token in/out, max slippage, and worst-case loss. -
Fail closed
If RPC data is inconsistent, simulation fails, or the route changes—stop and ask. -
Separate hot automation funds from cold storage
Keep automation budgets small; keep long-term holdings in cold storage.
This is also the moment where a hardware wallet becomes strategically relevant—not as an old-school tool, but as the human-in-the-loop root of trust.
Where OneKey fits: making “agentic finance” safer without killing the UX
As agents get more capable, users will want two modes:
- Automation mode (low limits, fast execution, policy-controlled)
- Vault mode (high value, explicit confirmation, offline signing)
A OneKey hardware wallet can naturally serve the second mode: keep long-term assets in self-custody, and only sign sensitive actions with a physical confirmation boundary—especially when the rest of the workflow is being orchestrated by an agent running Skills.
If you’re demoing a crypto Skill in Hong Kong, consider designing your flow so that the agent can do everything up to transaction preparation, while the final authorization remains a deliberate user action on a trusted signing device. That’s the kind of UX-security balance the market is converging toward in 2025–2026.
Apply now: bring your crypto Skill to Hong Kong
If your team is building agentic trading, payments automation, on-chain risk controls, or permissioned wallet infrastructure, this is a rare chance to demo to a cross-over audience from Web2 content communities and Web3-native builders.
- Official announcement: BlockBeats (律动) × Zhihu 香港 event post. (theblockbeats.info)
- Registration page: Sign up on Luma. (theblockbeats.info)
Web 4.0 won’t be defined by prettier interfaces. It will be defined by who holds permissions, how they are delegated, and how safely value can move when “the user” is an agent.
